IDEA Transition Policy Compliance and Best Practice: Perceptions of Transition Stakeholders

Career Development for Exceptional Individuals

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 169-184

  McMahan, Rachel ^a   Baer, Robert ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993710108     PISSN: 08857288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/088572880102400206     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baer, R., Simmons, T., & Flexer, R. (1996). Transition practice and policy compliance in Ohio: A survey of secondary special educators. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 19, 61-71.
2. Benz, M.R., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509-529.
3. deFur, S.H., & Taymans, J.M. (1995). Competencies needed for transition specialists in vocational rehabilitation, vocational education, and special education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 62, 38-51.
4. Flexer, R., McMahan, R.K., & Baer, R. (2001). Transition models and best practices. In R. Flexer, T. Simmons, P. Luft, & R. Baer (Eds.), Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (pp. 38-68). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
5. Hardman, M.L., McDonnel, J., & Welch, M. (1997). Perspectives on the future of IDEA. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 61-77.
6. Hasazi, S.B., Gordon, L.R., & Roe, C.A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455-469.
7. IDEA Proposed Rules, Fed. Reg. 55091 (1997) Volume 62 (to be codified 34 CFR, Section 300.347).
8. Johnson, D.R., Sharpe, M., & Sinclair, M.F. (1997). Report on the national survey of the implementation of the IDEA transition requirements. National Transition Network, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
9. Kelly, T.E. (1999). Why state mandates don't work. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 543-546.
10. Kohler, P.D. (1993). Best practice in transition: Substantiated or implied? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 107-121.
11. Kohler, P.D. (1994). An emerging model of transition practices. Presentation for the Ninth Annual Project Director's Meeting. Washington, D.C.
12. Phelps, L. & Hanley-Maxwell, C. (1997). School-to-work transitions for youth with disabilities: A review of outcomes and practices. Review of Educational Research, 67, 219-226.
13. Rist, R. (1988). Making evaluations useful. In C.A. Kochhar (Ed.), Excellence in doctoral leadership training: Special education and related services. Report of a National Conference, November 3-4, 1988. U.S. Dept. Of Ed., Division of Personnel Preparation, 109-118.
14. Stodden, R.A., & Leake, D.W. (1994). Getting to the core of transition: A re-assessment of old wine in new bottles. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 65-77.
15. Turner, L. (2001). Family involvement. In R. Flexer, T. Simmons, P. Luft, & R. Baer (Eds.), Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities (pp. 386-414). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
16. Wermuth, T.R., & Grayson, T.E. (1996). Case studies of state-level cross-disciplinary transition policy implementation. Champaign: University of Illinois. (Transition Research Institute Study No. BBB31910.)