Teaching Travelling Concepts in Europe

Feminist Theory

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 333-342

  Bahovec, Eva D ^a   Hemmings, Clare ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993709998     PISSN: 14647001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1464700104046982     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anzaldúa, G. (1989) Borderlands/La Frontera: the New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Press.
2. Appadurai, A. (1990) ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’, Theory, Culture and Society 7: 295-309.
3. Bahovec, E. (2000) ‘A Short Note on the Use of “Sex” and“Gender” in Slavic Languages’, The Making of European Women's Studies 1: 44-45.
4. Bahovec, E. (2002) ‘Feminist Theory and Philosophy: Morethan a Marriage of Convenience’, pp.135-146 in L. Passerini, D. Lyon and L. Borghi (eds) Gender Studies in Europe. European University Institute, University di Firenze and Athena.
5. Bal, M. (2002) Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: a RoughGuide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6. Barker, D.K. (2000) ‘Dualisms, Discourse, andDevelopment’, pp. 177-188 in U. Narayan and S. Harding (eds) Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural,Postcolonial, and Feminist World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7. Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference inContemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Braidotti, R. (2002a) ‘Becoming Woman, or Sexual DifferenceRevisited’, pp. 11-64 in R. Braidotti,Metamorphoses: Toward a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Braidotti, R. (2002b) ‘The Uses and Abuses of the Sex/GenderDistinction in European Feminist Practices’, pp.285-307 in G. Griffin and R. Braidotti (eds) Thinking Differently: a Reader in European Women'sStudies. London: Zed Books.
10. Braidotti, R., E. Charkiewicz, S. Hausler and S. Wieringa, eds (1994) Women, the Environment and SustainableDevelopment: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis. London: Zed Books.
11. Brown, W. (1997) ‘The Impossibility of Women's Studies’, Differences 9(3): 79-90.
12. Frankenberg, R. and L. Mani (1993) ‘Crosscurrents, Crosstalk - Race,“Postcoloniality”, and the Politics of Location’, Cultural Studies 7(2): 292-310.
13. Griffin, G., ed. (2002) Women's Employment, Women'sStudies, and Equal Opportunities 1945-2001: Reports from Nine EuropeanCountries. Hull: University of Hull.
14. Griffin, G. and R. Braidotti, eds (2002) Thinking Differently: a Reader in EuropeanWomen's Studies. London: Zed Books.
15. Haraway, D. (1991) ‘“ Gender” for aMarxist Dictionary: the Sexual Politics of a Word’, pp.127-148 in D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: theReinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
16. Jegerstedt, K. (2000) ‘A Short Introduction to the Use of “Sex” and“Gender” in the Scandinavian Languages’, The Making of European Women's Studies 1: 39-41.
17. Kaplan, C. (1997) ‘The Politics of Location asTransnational Feminist Critical Practice’, pp.137-152 in I. Grewal and C. Kaplan (eds) Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational FeministCritical Practice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Lempiainen, K. (2001) ‘A Short Review of the Finnish Concept“sukupuoli” (Gender)’, The Making of European Women's Studies 3: 86-89.
19. Lugones, M.C. (1987) ‘Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception’, Hypatia 2(2): 3-21.
20. Mohanty, C.T. (1992) ‘Feminist Encounters: Locating thePolitics of Experience’, pp. 74-92 in M. Barrett and A. Phillips (eds) Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Narayan, U. (1997) Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions andThird-World Feminism. New York: Routledge.
22. Peto, A. (2001) ‘Usage of Sex/Gender in Hungarian’, The Making of European Women's Studies 3: 49-53.
23. Probyn, E. (1990) ‘Travels in the Postmodern: Making Senseof the Local’, pp. 176-189 in L.J. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
24. Rich, A. (1986) ‘Notes Toward a Politics ofLocation’, pp. 210-231 in A. Rich,Blood, Bread and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979-85. New York: Norton.
25. Rivera Garretas, M. (2002) ‘Die Geschichte einer ZweckFreien Beziehung ohne Ende’, Die Philosophin 26(2): 69-78.
26. Rubin, G. (1975) ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on the“Political Economy” of Sex’, pp.157-210 in R. Reiter (ed.) Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.
27. Schor, N. (1995) ‘French Feminism is a Universalism’, Differences 7(1): 15-47.
28. Silius, H. (2002) ‘Comparative Summary’,pp. 470-511 in G. Griffin (ed.) Women's Employment, Women's Studies, and EqualOpportunities 1945-2001: Reports from Nine European Countries. Hull: University of Hull.
29. Spivak, G.C. (1999) A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History ofthe Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.