Effects of Item Grouping and Position of the “Don't Know” Option on Questionnaire Response

Field Methods

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 418-432

  Lam, Tony C M ^a   Green, Kathy E ^b   Bordignon, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993708200     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152582202237730     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alwin, D. F., and J. A. Krosnick. 1991. The reliability of survey attitude measurement: The influence of question and respondent attributes. Sociological Methods & Research 20 (1): 139–181.
2. American Marketing Association. 1937. The technique of marketing research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Budd, R. J. 1987. Response bias and the theory of reasoned action. Social Cognition 5 (2): 95–107.
4. Converse, J. M., and S. Presser. 1986. Survey questions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Fazio, R. H., T. M. Lenn, and E. A. Effrein. 1984. Spontaneous attitude formation. Social Cognition 2: 217–234.
6. Feick, L. F. 1989. Latent class analysis of survey questions that include “don’t know” responses. Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 525–547.
7. Gilljam, M., and D. Granberg. 1993. Should we take “don’t know” for an answer? Public Opinion Quarterly 57: 348–357.
8. Hamilton, J. C., and T. R. Shuminsky. 1990. Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 1301–1307.
9. Harris, R. J. 1994. ANOVA: An analysis of variance primer. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
10. Hoogstraten, J. 1979. Pretesting as determinant of attitude change in evaluation research. Applied Psychological Measurement 3: 25–30.
11. Howard, G. S., and P. R. Dailey. 1979. Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal of Applied Psychology 64: 144–150.
12. Johanson, G. A., C. J. Gips, and C. E. Rich. 1993. “If you can’t say something nice”:A variation on the social desirability response set. Evaluation Review 17 (1):116–122.
13. Knauper, B. 1999. The impact of age and education on response order effects in attitude measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 63: 347–370.
14. Knowles, E. S., and B. Byers. 1996. Reliability shifts in measurement reactivity:Driven by content engagement or self-engagement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (5): 1080–1090.
15. Krosnick, J. A., and D. F. Alwin. 1987. An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 201–219.
16. Lehman, D. R., H. A. Krosnick, R. L. West, and F. Li. 1992. The focus of judgment effect: A question wording effect due to hypothesis confirmation bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (6):690–699.
17. Mayer, D. P. 1999. Measuring instructional practice:Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21 (1):29–45.
18. Metzner, H., and F. Mann. 1953. Effects of grouping related questions in questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly 17 (1):136–140.
19. Miller, J. M., and J. A. Krosnick. 1998. The impact of candidate name order on election outcomes. Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 291–330.
20. Narayan, S., and J. A. Krosnick. 1996. Education moderates some response effects in attitude measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 58–88.
21. Noelle-Neumann, E. 1970. Wanted:Rules for wording structured questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 191–201.
22. Poe, G. S., I. Seeman, J. McLauglin, E. Mehl, and M. Dietz. 1988. “Don’t know” boxes in factual questions in a mail questionnaire:Effects on level and quality of response. Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 212–222.
23. Presser, S., and H. Schuman. 1989. The management of a middle position in attitude surveys. In Survey research methods, edited by E. Singer and S. Presser, 108–123. Chicago: University of Chicago.
24. Schroeder, S. 1985. Towards a theory of how people answer questions. European Research 13: 82–90.
25. Schuman, H., and S. Presser. 1996. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Schwarz, N., and H. J. Hippler. 1995. Reverse context effects in mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 59: 93–97.
27. Sigelman, L. 1981. Question-order effects on presidential popularity. Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 199–207.
28. Smith, T. W. 1981. Situational qualifications to generalized absolutes:An analysis of approval of hitting questions on the General Social Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 224–230.
29. Steinberg, L. 1994. Context and serial-order effects in personality measurement:Limits on the generality of measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 341–349.
30. Sudman, S., and N. M. Bradburn. 1983. Asking questions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Tenvergert, E., M. W. Gillespie, J. Kingma, and H. Klasen. 1992. Abortion attitudes, 1984–1987–1988: Effects of item order and dimensionality. Perceptual and Motor Skills 74: 627–642.
32. Todorov, A. 2000. The accessibility and applicability of knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (4):429–451.
33. Tourangeau, R., and K. A. Rasinski. 1986. Context effects in attitude surveys. Unpublished manuscript.
34. Tourangeau, R., and K. A. Rasinski. 1988. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3):299–314.