Commentary: When Funders Want to Compromise Your Design

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 392-395

  Eastmond, Nick ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993708174     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409801900312     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
3. Chen, H., & Rossi, P. H. (1983). Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7, 283-302.
4. Hill, D. (1995, November-December). The price of admission. Teacher Magazine, pp. 36-41.
5. Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.