The Effects of Deregulation on State Government Personnel Administration

Review of Public Personnel Administration

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 24-40

  Coggburn, Jerrell D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993705066     PISSN: 0734371X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X0002000404     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Anechiarico, F., & Jacobs, J.B. (1996). The pursuit of absolute integrity: Howcorruption controlmakes government ineffective. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Ban, C. & Riccucci, N.M. (1997). Public personnel management: Currentconcerns, future challenges (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
3. Ban, C. & Riccucci, N.M. (1994). New York State: civil service reform in a complex political environment Review of Public Personnel Administration 14 (2), 28-39.
4. Ban, C. ( 1995). How do public managers manage? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Barrett, K., & Greene, R. (1999). Grading the states: a management report card. Governing (February), 17-90.
6. Barzelay, M. with Armajani, B.J. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: Anewvision for managing in government Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Berman, E.M., Bowman, J.S., West, J.P., and Van Wart, M. 2001. Human Resource Management In Public Service: Paradoxes, Processes, and Problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Berry, F.S. & Berry, W.D. (1992). Tax innovation in the states: capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science 36, 715-42.
9. Blais, A., Blake, D.E., & Dion, S. (1997). Governments, parties, and public employees. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. Bowman, A.O.M. & Kearney, R.C. (1986). Resurgence of the states. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Brudney, J.L., Herbert, F.T., & Wnght, D.S. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform Public Administration Review 59 (1), 19-30.
12. Campbell, A.K. (1978). Revitalizing the federal personnel system. Public Personnel Management 7 (6), 58-63.
13. Carnevale, D.G. (1996). Merit system reform: A fifty state study. Periscope: Perspectives on Personnel 16 (2), 6-7.
14. Chackerian, R. (1996). Reorganization of state government: 1900-1985. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(1), 25-47.
15. forthcoming Coggburn, J.D. (forthcoming). Personnel deregulation: Exploring differences in the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
16. Coggburn, J.D. (1999). In search of deregulation: Exploring administrative reform in the American states. Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Carolina.
17. Cohen, S. & Eimicke, W. (1994). The overregulated civil service: The case of New York City's public personnel system Review of Public Personnel Administration 14 (2), 10-27
18. Conant, J.K. (1992). Executive branch reorganization in the states, 1965-1991. Book ofthe States, 1992-93. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
19. Conant, J.K. (1988). In the shadow of Wilson and Brownlow: Executive branchreorganization in the states, 1965-1987 Public Administration Review 48(5), 892-902.
20. Council of Sate Governments (CSG). (1999). Book of the states, 1998-1999 Lexington, KY: CSG.
21. DiIulio, J.J. (1994). Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
22. DiIulio, J.J., Garvey, G., & Kettl, D.F. (1993). Improving government performance: An owner's manual? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
23. Dilger, R.J. (1998). Does politics matter? Partisanship's impact on state spending and taxes, 1985-1995. State and Local Government Review 30 (2), 139-144.
24. Dresang, D.L. (1978). Public personnel reforms: A summary of state government. Public Personnel Management 7(5), 287-294.
25. Dubnick, M.J. (1994). A coup against king bureaucracy?” In J. J. DiIulio, Jr. (Ed.), Deregulating the public service: Cangovernmentbe improved? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
26. Enkson, R.S., Wright, G.C., & McIver, J.P. (1993). Statehouse democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Facer, R.L., II. (1998). Reinventing public administration: Reform in the Georgia civil service. Public Administration Quarterly 22 (1), 58-73.
28. Frederickson, D.G. & Perry, J.L. (1998). Overcoming employee resistance to change. In P. W. Ingraham, J. R. Thompson, & R. P. Sanders (Eds.), Transforming government: Lessons from the reinvention laboratories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
29. Garvey, G.J. & DiIulio, J.J., Jr. (1994). Sources of public sector overregulation. In J. J. DiIulio, Jr. (Ed.), Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
30. Gore, A. (1996). The best kept secrets in government. New York: Random House.
31. Gossett, C.W. (1997). Civil service reform: The case of Georgia. Paper presented at the Southern Political Science Association's Annual Meeting, November 6, 1997.
32. Gray, V. (1999). The socioeconomic and political context of states. In V. Gray, R. L.Hanson, & H. Jacob (Eds.), Politics in the American states (7th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33. Horner, C. (1994). Deregulating the federal service: Is the time right? In J. J. DiIulio, Jr. (Ed.), Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
34. Horner, C. (1988). Beyond Mr. Gradgrind: The case for deregulating the public sector. Policy Review 44, 34-38.
35. Ink, D. ( 1983). Foreword to Revitalizing federal management: Managers and their overburdened systems. Washington, DC: NAPA.
36. Jacoby, W.G. (1991). Data theory and dimensional analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Jorgensen, L., Fairless, K., & Patton, W.D. (1996). Underground merit systems and the balance between service and compliance. ReviewofPublic Personnel Administration 16(2), 5-20.
38. Kearney, R.C. & Hays, S.W. (1998). Reinventing government, the new public management and civil service systems in international perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration 18(4), 38-54.
39. Kellough, E.J. & Lu, H. (1983). The paradox of merit pay in the public sector: Persistence of a problematic procedure. Review of Public Personnel Administration 13(2), 45-64.
40. Kravchuk, R.S. (1993). The 'New Connecticut:' Lowell Weicker and the process of administrative reform. PublicAdministration Review 53(4), 329-339.
41. Lavigna, R. (1996). Creating a responsive personnel system. PA Times 19(11), 10 & 14.
42. Light, P.C. (1997). The tides of reform: Making government work, 1945-1995 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43. Litscher, J.E. (1997). Reinventing personnel systems: Wisconsin is redesigning how it attracts, retains and motivates talented employees. State Government News 40(8), 25 & 31.
44. Meier, K.J. (1980). Executive reorganization of government: impact on employment and expenditures. American Journal of Political Science 24 (3), 396-412.
45. National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). (1983). Revitalizingfederal management: Managers and their overburdened systems. Washington, DC: NAPA.
46. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO). (1995). Workplace polices: State activity and innovations. Washington, D.C.: NASBO.
47. National Association of State Personnel Executives (NASPE). (1996). State personnel office: Roles and functions (3rd ed.). Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
48. National Commission on the Public Service (Volcker Commission). (1989). Leadership for America: Rebuilding the public service. Washington, DC: National Commission on the Public Service.
49. National Commission on the State and Local Service (Winter Commission). (1993). Hard truths/tough choices: An agenda forstate and local reform. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute.
50. National Performance Review (NPR). (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51. Osborne, D. (1993). Civil service reform: Is it really that complicated? Governing (April), 80.
52. Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Plume.
53. Ospina, S. (1992). 'Expediency management' in public service: a dead-end search for managerial discretion. Public Productivity and Management Review 15 (4), 405-421.
54. Perry, J., Wise, L.R., & Martin, M. (1994). Breaking the civil service mold: The case of Indianapolis. Review of Public Personnel Administration 14(2), 40-54.
55. Peters, B.G. (1996). The future of governing: Four emerging models. Lawrence, KS:University of Kansas Press.
56. Plotnick, R.D., & Winters, R.F. (1990). Party, political liberalism, and redistribution: An application to the American states. American Politics Quarterly 18, 430-458.
57. Romzek, B.S. (1997). Accountability challenges of deregulation. In C. Ban & N. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management: Current concerns, future challenges 2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
58. Rosenbloom, D.H. (1993). Have an administrative Rx? Don't forget the politics ! Public Administration Review 53 (6), 503-507.
59. Sabato, L. (1983 ). Goodbye to good-time Charlie Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
60. Sanford, T. (1967). Storm over the states. New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Savas, E.S. & Ginsburg, S.G. (1973) The civil service: A meritless system? The Public In terest 32, 70-85.
62. Schneider, S.K. (1993). Examining the relationship between public policies: AFDC and Medicaid. PublicAdministration Review 53(4), 368-380.
63. Schneider, S.K. ( 1989). Governors and health care policy. Policy Studies Journal 17 (4), 809-812.
64. Schneider, S.K., & Jacoby, W.G. (1996). Influences on bureaucratic initiatives in the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6, 495-522.
65. Spector, P.E. (1992). Summated rating scale Construction: An introduction Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
66. Thompson, F.J. (1994). The Winter Commission Report: Is deregulation the answer for public personnel management?” Review of Public Personnel Administration 14(2), 5-9.
67. United States Census Bureau. (1999). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1999. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.
68. United States Census Bureau. (1998). State government employment and payroll, 1998 Washington, DC: U. S. Census Bureau.
69. United States Census Bureau. (1998b). State government finances, 1998. Washington, DC: U. S. Census Bureau.
70. United States Merit Systems Protection Board. ( 1998). Sf-171: Not gone, not forgotten. Issues of Merit (May), 4-5.
71. United States Office of Personnel Management. ( 1998). Deregulation and the delegation of human resources management authority in the federal government (MSE-98-3 Washington, DC: Office of Personnel Management.
72. Volcker Commission 1989 (see the National Commission on the Public Service
73. Volcker, P.A. & Winter, W.F. (1994). Introduction: Democracy and public service. In J. J. DiIulio, Jr. (Ed.), Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
74. Wechsler, B. (1994). Reinventing Florida's civil service system: The failure of reform. Review of Public PersonnelAdministration 14 (2), 64-76.
75. Wechsler, B. ( 1993). Florida's civil service reform Spectrum, 45-51.
76. West, W.F. & Durant, R.F. (2000). Merit, management, and neutral competence: Lessons from the U. S. Merit Systems Protection Board, FY 1988-FY 1997 Public Administration Review 60 (2), 111-122.
77. Wilson, J.Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: Whatgovernment agencies do and why they do it. NY: Basic Books.
78. Winter Commission. (1993). (see National Commission on the State and Local Service.)