The regulation of argumentative reasoning in pedagogic discourse

Discourse Studies

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 420-451

  Love, Kristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

argumentative reasoning; pedagogic discourse; secondary English; social semiotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993701250     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445600002004002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrews, R., Costello, P. and Clarke, S. (1993) Improving the Quality of Argument, pp. 5-16. Hull: University of Hull Press.
2. Bernstein, B. (1990) Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 4: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
3. Bernstein, B. (1996) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
4. Burbules, N. (1993) Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Cameron, D. (1998) ‘Is There any Ketchup, Vera?.’: Gender, Power and Pragmatics’, Discourse & Society 9(4): 437-455.
6. Chouliaraki, L. (1998) ‘Regulation in “Progressivist” Pedagogic Discourse: Individualized Teacher-Pupil Talk’, Discourse & Society 9(1): 5-32.
7. Christie, F. (1989) Curriculum Genres in Early Childhood Education: A Case Study in Writing Development, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
8. Christie, F. (1990) ‘Changing the Face of literacy’, in F. Christie (ed.) Literacy for a Changing World, pp. 1-25. Melbourne: ACER.
9. Christie, F. (1997) ‘Curriculum Macrogenres as Forms of Initiation into a Culture’, in F. Christie and J.R. Martin (eds) Genre and Institutions, pp. 134-160. London: Cassell.
10. Christie, F. (1999) ‘The Pedagogic Device and the Teaching of English’, in Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness. Cassell: London.
11. Clyne, M. (1980) ‘Writing, Testing and Culture’, The Secondary Teacher 11: 32-35.
12. Davison, C. (1998) ‘It's Your Opinion that Counts: ESL Students and Written Argument in Senior Secondary English’, unpublished PhD thesis, LaTrobe University, Melbourne.
13. Dixon, J. (1975) Growth through English. Huddersfield: Oxford University Press.
14. Edwards, A.D. (1980) ‘Patterns of Power and Authority in Classroom Talk’, in P. Woods (ed.) Teacher Strategies, pp. 237-253. London: Croom Helm.
15. Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (1997) Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
16. Ellison, P. (1990) Nothing Like the Sun. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
17. Gee, J.P. (1990) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Falmer Press.
18. Gee, P. (1992) The Social Mind. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
19. Gregory, M. (1985) ‘Towards “Communication” Linguistics’, in J.D. Benson and W. Greaves (eds) Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, pp. 119-134. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Halliday, M.A.K. (1975) Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
21. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
22. Halliday, M.A.K. (1979) ‘Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions’, in D.J. Allerton, E. Carney and D. Holdcroft (eds) Function and Context in Linguistics Analysis: A Festschrift for William Haas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993) ‘Language in a Changing World’, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Occasional Paper No 13.
24. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Edward Arnold.
25. Hunter, I. (1991) ‘Learning the Literate Lesson: The Limits of the Aesthetic Personality’, in C. Baker and A. Luke (eds) Towards a Critical Sociology of Reading Pedagogy, pp. 49-82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Hunter, I. (1994) ‘Four Anxieties About English’, Interpretations 27(3): 1-19.
27. Iedema, R. (1998) ‘Institutional Responsibility and Hidden Meanings’, Discourse & Society 9(4): 481-500.
28. Kuhn, D. (1992) ‘Thinking as Argument’, Harvard Educational Review 62(2): 155-178.
29. Liddicoat, A., Dopke, S., Love, K. and Brown, A. (1994) ‘Presenting a Point of View: Callers' Contributions to Talkback Radio in Australia’, Journal of Pragmatics 22(4): 139-156.
30. Love, K. (1999) ‘The Whole Class Text Response Discussion Genre in Secondary English: A Case Study’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.
31. Love, K. and Suherdi, D. (1996) ‘The Negotiation of Knowledge in an Adult ESL Class’, Linguistics and Education 8(3): 229-267.
32. Martin, J.R. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33. Mercer, N. (1994) ‘Neo-Vygotskian Theory and Classroom Education’, in B. Steirer and J. Maybin (eds) Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice, Multilingual Matters. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
34. Medway, P. (1989) ‘Argument as Social Action’, in R. Andrews (ed.) Narrative and Argument. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
35. Tannen, D. (1994) Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Thomson J. (1987) Understanding Teenagers' Reading. Adelaide: Australian Association of the Teachers of English.
37. Thomson, J. (1992) ‘The Significance and Uses of Contemporary Literary Theory’, in J. Thomson (ed.) Reconstructing Literature Teaching: New Essays on the Teaching of Literature, pp. 3-39. Norwood, South Africa: AATE.
38. Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Vygotsky, L. (1991) ‘Genesis of the Higher Mental Functions’, in P. Light (ed.) Learning to Think, pp. 32-41. London: Routledge.
40. Wells, G. (1986) The Meaning Makers: Children Learning Language and Using Language to Learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
41. Wells, G. (1999) ‘Language and Education: Reconceptualising Education as Dialogue’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19: 135-155.