A model-based approach to simulation composition

Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Software Reusability, SSR 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 73-82

  Aronson, Jesse ^a   Bose, Prasanta ^b  

^a SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b George Mason University   (United States)

Author keywords

Component selection; Composition; Constraints; Domain specific architectural model; Hierarchical decomposition; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; REUSABILITY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATIONS;

ARCHITECTURAL MODELING; COMPONENT SELECTION; CONSTRAINTS; HIERARCHICAL DECOMPOSITIONS; SIMULATION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 84993692080     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/303008.303031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Allen, R. and D. Garlan. Formal Modeling and Analysis of the HLA RTI. Proc. 1997 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Orlando, FL. March 1997.
2. Aronson, J. and P. Bose. Architectural Model-Driven Approach to Simulation Component Composition. Submitted to ICSE '99.
3. Batory, D. and B. J. Geraci. Validating Component Compositions in Software System Generators. U. Texas at Austin Dept. of Computer Sciences Technical Report 95-03.
4. Binns, P., M. Englehart, M. Jackson, and S. Vestal, Domain-Specific Software Architectures for Guidance, Navigation and Control. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol 20. 1994.
5. Denning, P. and P. Dargan. A Discipline Of Software Architecture. Interactions, Vol 1, No. 1, January 1994.
6. Edwards, S. Common Interface Models For Reusable Software. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Vol 3, No. 2. p. 193-206. February 1993.
7. Falkenhainer, B. and K. Forbus. "Compositional Modeling: Finding the Right Model for the Job". Artificial Intelligence, 51 (1-3). October, 1991.
8. Falkenhainer, B., A. Farquhar, D. Bobrow, R. Fikes, K. Forbus, T. Gruber, Y. Iwasaki, & B. Kuipers. CML: A Compositional Modeling Language. Knowledge Systems Laboratory. KSL-94-16. September 1994.
9. Fowler M. and K. Scott. UML Distilled. Addison Wesley. 1997.
10. Garlan, D. R. Monroe and D. Wile. Acme: An Architecture Description Interchange Language. Proc. CASCON '97. November 1997.
11. Garlan, D., R. Allen and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural Mismatch or Why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts. Proc. 17th Int'l Conf. On Software Engineering. Seattle, WA. April 1995.
12. Gomaa, H. An Object-Oriented Domain Analysis and Modeling Method for Software Reuse. Proc. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii. January 1992.
13. Jackson, M. and P. Zave. Distributed Feature Composition: A Virtual Architecture for Telecommunications Services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, to appear.
14. Jazayeri, M.. Component Programming - a fresh look at software components. Technical University of Vienna Technical Report TUV-1841-95-01. February 2, 1995.
15. Kazman, R. A Challenge for Software Architecture: Distributed Flight Simulation, in Handbook Of Parallel And Distributed Computing. A. Zomaya (ed.). McGraw-Hill, 1995.
16. Kazman, R. A Challenge for Software Architecture: Distributed Flight Simulation, in Handbook Of Parallel And Distributed Computing. A. Zomaya (ed.). McGraw-Hill, 1995.
17. Kazman, R., P. Clements, G. Abowd and L. Bass. Classifying Architectural Elements as a Foundation for Mechanism Matching. Proceedings of COMPSAC 1997. August 1997. pp. 14-17.
18. Labrou, Y. and T. Finin. Semantics and Conversations for an Agent Communication Language. In Readings in Agents. M. Huhns and M. Singh, eds. Morgan Kaufman. San Franscisco. 1998. p. 235-242.
19. Lowry, M., A. Philpot, T. Pressburger, I. Underwood. A Formal Approach to Domain-Oriented Software Design Environments. Proc. 9th Knowledge-Based Software Engineering Conference. Monterey, CA. September 1994.
20. Luckham, D. C, John J. Kenney, Larry M. Augustin, James Vera, Doug Bryan, and Walter Mann. Specification and analysis of system architecture using Rapide. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1995.
21. Luckham, D. et. al. Applying Event-Based Modelling to the ADS High Level Architecture. Available at ftp://pavg.stanford.edU/pub/Rapide-l.0/hla-oview.ps.Z.
22. Microsoft Corporation. COM Technical Overview. Available at http://www.microsoft.com/com.
23. Mili, A., R. Mili and R. Mittermeir. Storing and Retrieving Software Components: A Refinement Based System.Proc.l6lh International Conference on Software Engineering. May 16-21, 1994. Sorrento, Italy. Pages 91-100.
24. Monroe, R. Capturing Software Architecture Design Expertise With Armani. Technical Report CMU-CS-98-163, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, October 1998
25. Pautler, D., S. Woods, and A. Quilici. Exploiting Domain-Specific Knowledge To Refine Simulation Specifications. Proc Twelfth Annual IEEE Conference on Automated Software Engineering. Incline Village, Nevada, pp. 117-124. November, 1997.
26. Pautler, D., S. Woods, and A. Quilici. Exploiting Domain-Specific Knowledge To Refine Simulation Specifications. Proc Twelfth Annual IEEE Conference on Automated Software Engineering. Incline Village, Nevada, pp. 117-124. November, 1997.
27. Penix, J. and P. Alexander. Design Representation for Automating Software Component Reuse. Proc. First Internationa] Workshop on Knowledge-Based Systems for the (Re)use of Program Libraries. Sophia Antipolis (France). June 1995.
28. Penix, J., P. Baraona, and P. Alexander. Classification and Retrieval of Reusable Components Using Semantic Features. Proc. of the 10th Knowledge-Based Software Engineering Conference. September 1995
29. Powell, E. and D. Pratt. The Joint Simulation System Architecture: A Foundation for Future Training Systems. Proc. of 19lh I/ITSEC. December 1997.
30. Prieto-Diaz, R. and P. Freeman. Classifying Software for Reusability. Software. January 1987. pp 6-16.
31. Purtilo, J. and J. Atlee. Module Reuse by Interface Adaption. Software-Practice and Experience, Vol 21, No. 6, June 1991.
32. Rational Rose 98. Tool and Documentation. Rational Software Corporation.
33. Robbins, J. E., et. al. Integrating Architecture Description Languages with a Standard Design Method. Proc. ICSE '98. Kyoto.
34. Rollins, E. J. and J. M. Wing. Specifications as Search Keys for Software Libraries. Proc. 8th Intl. Conference on Logic Programming. January 1991.
35. Shaw, M. and D. Garlan. Software Architecture: Perspectives from an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ. 1996.
36. Shaw, M. and P. Clements. A Field Guide to Boxology: Preliminary Classification of Architectural Styles for Software Systems. Proc. 21st Annual Intl. Computer Software and Applications Conf. (COMPSAC '97). August 1997
37. Shaw, M. Truth vs. Knowledge: The Difference Between What a Component Does and What We Know It Does. Proc. IWSSD-8. March 1996.
38. Sullivan, K. et. al. Building Applications from Massive Components. Proc. 21st Software Engineering Workshop. Greenbelt, MD, 1996.
39. Szyperski, C. Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley. New York. 1998.
40. Workshop on Compositional Software Architectures. Monterey, California. January 6-8, 1998. http:/www.obis.com/workshops/ws9801/index.htrril
41. Zaremski, A. M. and J. M. Wing. Signature matching, a tool for using software libraries. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM). April 1995.
42. Zaremski, A. M. and J. M. Wing. Specification Matching of Software Components. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. October 1997.