Commentary: Advocacy, Care, and Power

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 119-122

  Davis, James Earl ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993683958     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821409902000113     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Chelimsky, E. (1998). The role of experience in formulating theories of evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 35-55.
3. Courville, C. (1993). Re-examining patriarchy as a mode of production: The case of Zimbabwe. In S. M. James & A. Busia (Eds.), Theorizing black feminism: The visionary pragmatism of Black Women (pp. 31-43). London and New York: Routledge.
4. Greene, J. C. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 25-35.
5. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
6. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.