Rigor and Relevance in NDM: How to Study Decision Making Rigorously With Small Ns and Without Controls and (Inferential) Statistics

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 99-112

  Lipshitz, Raanan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993683899     PISSN: 15553434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/155534310X12832746013015     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aha D. W. (1992). Generalizing from case studies: A case study Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (pp. 1-10). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
2. Allende J. E. (2004). Rigor-The essence of scientific work Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 7. Retrieved April 13, 2010, from http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0717-34582004000100001&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
3. Ariely D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York HarperCollins
4. Bernstein R. I. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Press
5. Blumer H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley, CA University of California Press
6. Boudreau G. (2001). The mental representations underlying naval operations (TR 2001-068). Toronto, Canada Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine
7. Buchler J. (2000). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York Dover
8. Campbell D. T. (1975). “Degrees of freedom” and the case study Comparative Political Studies, 8, 178-193
9. Chi M. T. H. Feltovich P. J. Glaser R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152
10. Chiovitti R. F. Piran N. (2003). Rigor and grounded theory research Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44, 427-435
11. Cohen M. Freeman J. R. (2008). Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Arlington, VA Cognitive Technologies
12. Connell L. Keane M. T. (2006). A model of plausibility Cognitive Science, 30, 95-120
13. Corbin J. Strauss A. C. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
14. Daston L. Galison P. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge, MA Zone Books, MIT Press
15. Diamond J. (2005). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York W. W. Norton
16. Fincham R. Clark T. (2009). Introduction: Can we bridge the rigor-relevance gap? Journal of Management Studies, 46, 510-515
17. Firestone W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research Educational Researcher, 22, 16-23
18. Fisher R. P. Brennan K. H. McCauley M. R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall In Eisen M., Goodman G., Quas J.,(Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 265-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
19. Flyvbjerg B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245
20. Fuchs S. (1997). A sociological theory of objectivity Science Studies, 11, 4-26
21. Gergen K. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
22. Gillies D. (1998). The Duhem thesis and the Quine thesis In Curd M., Cover J. A.,(Eds.), Philosophy of science: The central issues (pp. 302-319). New York: W. W. Norton
23. Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D.,(Eds). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
24. Hodgkinson G. P. Rousseau D. M. (2009). Bridging the rigor-relevance gap in management research: It's already happening! Journal of Management Studies, 46, 534-546
25. Huberman M., Miles M. B.,(Eds.). (2002). The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage
26. Kahneman D., Slovic P. A., Tversky A.,(Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York Cambridge University Press
27. Kaplan A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco Chandler
28. Kennedy M. M. (1979). Generalizing from single case studies Evaluation Review, 3, 661-678
29. Kiesler A. Leiner L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable Journal of Management Studies, 20, 516-533
30. Klayman J. (2003, May). An NDM wish list: “Friendly opposition.” Paper presented at the Sixth Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, Pensacola, Florida
31. Klein G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA MIT Press
32. Lincoln Y. S. Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA SAGE
33. Lipshitz R. Bar Ilan O. (1996). How problems are solved: Reconsidering the phase theorem Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 48-60
34. Lipshitz R. Ben Shaul O. (1997). Schemata and mental models in recognition-primed decision making In Zsambok C., Klein G. A.,(Eds.), Naturalistic decision making (pp. 293-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
35. Lipshitz R. Leshem-Levy D. Orchen K. (2006). How to solve real-world problems: A lay model of effective real-world problem solving Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 413-430
36. Lipshitz R. Strauss O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision making analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 149-163
37. Locke E. A. (2009). It's time we brought introspection out of the closet Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 24-25
38. Magnani L. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific reasoning Semiotica, 153, 1-4
39. Maxwell J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300
40. McCloskey D. N. (1994). How economists persuade Journal of Economic Methodology, 1, 15-32
41. Mishler E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415-441
42. Morse J. Barret M. Mayan M. Olson K. Spiers J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 1-19
43. Myrdal G. (1969). Objectivity in social research. New York Random House
44. Nocera J. (2009). Same data, conflicting forecasts New York Times, May 1, 2009. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/02/business/02nocera.html
45. Polanyi M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York Doubleday
46. Polkinghorne D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York State University of New York Press
47. Ponterotto J. (2006). Brief note on the origins, evolution and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description Qualitative Report, 11, 538-549
48. Popper K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
49. Popper K. (1976). Unended quest. London Routledge
50. Porter T. M. (1996). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
51. Posner R. A. (1994). The problems of jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
52. Reason J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, MA Cambridge University
53. Ryle G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago University of Chicago Press
54. Sandelowski M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: The problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited Advances in Nursing Science, 16 (2), 1-8
55. Shadish W. R. Cook T. D. Campbell D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi- experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston Houghton Miflin
56. Sieck W. R. Klein G. Peluso D. A. Smith J. L. Harris-Thompson D. (2004). FOCUS: A model of sensemaking (Final Tech. Report, Contract 1435-01-01-CT-31161, U.S. Army Research Institute). Fairborn, OH Klein Associates
57. Simon H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA MIT Press
58. Snook S. A. (2002). Friendly fire: The accidental shootdown of U.S. Black Hawks over northern Iraq. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
59. Starkey K. Hatchuel A. Tempest S. (2009). Management research and the new logics of discovery and engagement Journal of Management Studies, 46, 547-558
60. Toulmin S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA Cambridge University Press
61. Weick K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. London Sage
62. Weick K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage