UCLA Community College Review: Performance Indicators and Performance-Based Funding in Communitq Colleges

Community College Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 62-76

  Zarkesh, Maryam ^a   Beas, Allison Marcela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993661432     PISSN: 00915521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009155210403100404     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Alfred, R., McClenney, K., Hudgins, J., & Ewell, P. (1999). Core indicators of effectiveness for community colleges. Washington, DC: Community College Press.
2. Callan, P. M., Doyle, W., & Finney, J. E. (2001). Evaluating state higher education performance: Measuring Up 2000. Change, 33 (2), 10-19.
3. Carnevale, A. P., Johnson, N. C., & Edwards, A. R. (1998, April 10). Performance-based appropriations: Fad or wave of the future? The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 1-5. Retrieved February 10, 2004 from http://www.chronicle.com/prm/che-data/articles.dir/art-44.dir/issue-31.dir/31bO0601.htm
4. Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2003). The American community college. (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Cohen, A. M. (1998). The shaping of American higher education: Emergence and growth of the contemporary system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Education Commission of the States. (2000). State funding for community colleges: A 50 state survey. Denver, CO: ECS, Center for Community College Policy.
7. Ewell, P. T. (1999). A delicate balance: The role of evaluation in management. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
8. Office of Policy, Planning, & Research. (2002). Quality Indicator System. Retrieved April 7, 2003, from Colorado Community College System Web site: http://www.cccs.edu/POPLAR/QIS.html
9. Outcalt, C. L., & Rabin, J. (1998). Responding to accountabilitv mandates. ERIC digest. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED421181)
10. Potter, W. (2003, August 8). State lawmakers again cut higher-education spending. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A22-A22.
11. Schmidt, P. (1996, May 24). More states tie spending on colleges to meeting specific goals. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 1-5. Retrieved February 10, 2004 from http://www.chronicle.com/prm/che-data/articles.dir/art-42.dir/issue-37.dir/37aO2301.htm
12. Schmidt, P. (1998, July 24). States increasingly link budgets to performance. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 1-3. Retrieved February 10, 2004 from http://www.chronicle.com/prm/che-data/articles.dir/art-44.dir/issue-46.dir/46aO2601.htm
13. Schmidt, P. (2002, February 22). Most states tie aid to performance, despite little proof that it works. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A20-A20.
14. Strauss, L. (2001). Trends in community college financing: Challenges of the past, present, and future. ERIC digest. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467983)
15. Zarkesh, M., & Beas, A. M. (2003). Indicators and community college trends 2000-2003. Unpublished manuscript. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. in process)