How to keep the practice of librarianship relevant in the age of the Internet

vine

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 14-37

  Weinheimer, James L ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993089481     PISSN: 03055728     EISSN: 14741032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb040723     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Baldonado, M., Chang, C.C.K., Gravano, L. and Paepke, A., 1997, The Stanford Digital Library metadata architecture. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 1 (2), pp. 108-121.
2. Beagrie, N., 1999, Convergence and integration online: the Arts and Humanities Data Service gateway and catalogues. Paper delivered at Museums and the Web 1999, New Orleans, La., 11-14 March. http://mwv.archimuse.com/mw99/papers/beagrie/beagrie.html
3. Beagrie N. and Greenstein, D., 1998, A strategic policy framework for creating and preserving digital collections. London: Arts and Humanities Data Service. http://ahds.ac.uk/manage/framework.htm
4. Bearman, D., 1994, Electronic evidence: strategies for managing records in contemporary organizations. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Archives and Museum Informatics.
5. Bearman, D. and Sochats, K., 1996, Metadata requirements for evidence. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh, School of Information Science. http://www.lis.pitt.edu/~nhprc/BACartic.html
6. Belcher, M., Knight, V. and Place, E., eds., 1999, DESIRE Information Gateways Handbook. DESIRE II project deliverable D3.4. Bristol: Institute for Learning and Research Technology. http://www.desire.org/html/subjectgateways/handbook/
7. Brickley, D., Gardner, T., Heery, R. and Hiom, D., 1999, Recommendations on implementation of quality ratings in an RDF environment. DESIRE II project deliverable D3.1. Bristol: Institute for Learning and Research Technology. http://www.desire.org/html/research/deliverables/D3.1/
8. Cameron, J. and Pearce, J., 1998, PANDORA at the crossroads: issues and future directions. In: Sixth DELOS Workshop: Preservation of Digital Information, Tomar, Portugal, 17-19 June 1998. Le Chesnay: ERCIM, 1998, pp. 23-30. http:/www..ercim.org/publication/ws-proceedings/DELOS6/index.html
9. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 1999, Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS), Red Book, Issue 1. CCSDS 650.0-R-l. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, May. http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa.gov/nost/isoas/ref_model.html
10. Cox, S., 1999, Recording qualified Dublin Core metadata in HTML. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Working Draft. Nedlands, WA.: CSIRO Exploration & Mining. http://www.agcrc.csiro.au/projects/3018CO/metadata/qdchtml/
11. Day, M., 1996, Mapping between metadata formats. Bath: UKOLN, UK Office for Library and Information Networking. http://www.ukoIn.ac.uk/metadata/interoperability/
12. Day, M., 1997, Extending metadata for digital preservation. Ariadne (Web version), 9, May. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue9/metadata/