Examining the Effectiveness and Suitability of Referral and Assessment in Intermediate Care Services

Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 42-48

  Kotiadis, K ^a   Carpenter, g ^a   Mackenzie, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Intermediate Care; Older People

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993087758     PISSN: 14769018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14769018200400031     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Anderson W & Bungay H (2004) Assessing patients’ eligibility for fully funded nursing care. Nursing Times 100 (2) 38-41.
2. Carpenter I & Calnan M (1997) Grey matters. Health Service Journal 107 (5,535) 22-4.
3. Department of Health (2001a) The Single Assessment Process: Consultation Papers and Process. www.doh.gov.uk/scg/sap/index.htm.
4. Department of Health (2001b) Intermediate Care. HSC 2001/01:LAC London: DoH.
5. Department of Health (2001c) National Service Framework for Older People. London: DoH.
6. Department of Health (2001d) Single Assessment Process: Key Implications, Guidance for Local Implementation and Annexes to the Guidance. www.doh.gov.uk/scg/sap/index.htm.
7. Department of Health (2002a) Single Assessment Process: Assessment Tools and Scales. www.doh.gov.uk/scg/sap/toolsandscales/index.htm.
8. Department of Health (2002b) Fair Access to Care Services, Guidance on Eligibility Criteria for Adult Social Care. London: DoH.
9. Department of Health (2003) Changes to Local Authorities’ Charging Regime for Community Equipment and Intermediate Care Services. LAC (2003)14. London: DoH.
10. InterRAI (2003) www.interrai.org.
11. Nancarrow S (2004) Improving intermediate care: giving practitioners a voice. Journal of Integrated Care 12 (1) 33-41.