Networks And Governance In Trade Associations: Aeic And Nela In The Development Of The American Electricity Industry 1885-1910

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

Volumn 17, Issue , 1997, Pages 57-110

  Chung, Chi Nien ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993087670     PISSN: 0144333X     EISSN: 17586720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb013317     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Arthur, W. Brian. 1984. “Competing Technologies and Economic Prediction.” Options (April) HAS A Laxenburg, Austria.
2. Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events.” The Economic Journal 99:116-131.
3. Arthur, W. Brian. 1994a. “Positive feedbacks in the economy.” Chapter 1 in Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 1-12.
4. Arthur, W. Brian. 1994b. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Small Events.” Chapter 2 in Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp.13-32.
5. Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett, and L.C. Freeman. 1992. UCINETIV Version 1.07. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.
6. Borgatti, S.P. and M.G. Everett. 1992. “The notion of position in social network analysis.” in Marsden, P. (ed.), Sociological Methodology, 1992. London: Basil Blackwell.
7. Brieger, Ronald L. 1988. “The duality of persons and groups.” in Wellman, Barry and S.D. Berkowitz, ed., Social Structure: A Network Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.83-92.
8. Campbell, John L. and Leon N. Lindberg. 1991. “The evolution of governance regimes.” in Campbell, John, J. Rogers Hollingsworth, and Leon N. Lindberg, ed., Governance of the American Economy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.319-355.
9. Campbell, John L., J. Rogers Hollingsworth, and Leon N. Lindberg. 1991. Governance of the American Economy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. David, Paul. 1985. “Clio and the economies of QWERTY.” American Economic Review Proceedings 75:332-337.
12. Dalton, Melville. 1959. Men who manage: Fusions of feeling and theory in administration. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Doreian, Patrick. 1980. “On the evolution of group and network structure.” Social Networks 2:235-252.
14. Doreian, Patrick. 1986. “On the evolution of group and network structure II.” Social Networks 8:33-64.
15. Everett, M.G. 1885. “Role similarity and complexity in social networks.” Social Networks 7:353-359.
16. Everett, M.G. and S.P. Borgatti. 1988. “Calculating role similarities: An algorithm that helps determine the orbits of a graph.” Social Networks 10:77-91.
17. Freeman, L.C. 1979. “Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification.” Social Networks 1:215-239.
18. Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3):481-510.
19. Granovetter, Mark. 1992. “Economic institutions as social constructions: A framework for analysis.” Acta Sociologica 35:3-11.
20. Granovetter, Mark and Richard Swedberg (ed.) 1992. The sociology of economic life. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
21. Hirsch, P., Stuart Michaels, and Ray Friedman. 1987. “Dirty hands versus clean models: Is sociology in danger of being seduced by economics?” Theory and Society 16:317-336.
22. Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Leon N. Lindberg. 1985. “The governance of the American economy: the role of markets, clans, hierarchies, and associative behavior.” in Streeck, Wolfgang and Philippe C. Schmitter, ed., Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills, California: Sage, pp.221-254.
23. Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Robert Boyer. 1995. “Co-ordination of economic actors and social systems of production.” in Boyer, Robert and Rogers J. Hollingsworth, ed., Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions (forthcoming).
24. Hollingsworth, Rogers, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck (ed.). 1994. Governing Capitalist Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Hughes, Thomas. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification of America 1880-1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
26. Insull, Samuel. 1924. Public Utilities and Modem Life: Selected Speeches 1914-1923. Ed. - William Kelley, Chicago: Privately Published.
27. Krackhardt, David. 1992. “The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations.” in Nohria, Nitin and Robert G. Eccles, ed., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp.216-239.
28. Krackhardt, David. 1993. “Informal networks: The company behind the chart.” Harvard Business Review (July 1993): 105-111.
29. Lindberg, Leon, John L. Campbell and J. Rogers Hollingsworth. 1991. “Economic governance and the analysis of structural change in the American economy.” in Campbell, John, J. Rogers Hollingsworth, and Leon N. Lindberg, ed., Governance of the American Economy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University-Press, pp.3-34.
30. Macaulay, Stewart. 1963. “Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study.” American Sociological Review 28:55-67.
31. McGuire, Patrick, Mark Granovetter, and Michael Schwartz. 1992. Book Prospectus for The Social Construction of Industry: Human Agency in the Development, Diffusion, and Institutionalization of the Electric Utility Industry.
32. McGuire, Patrick, Mark Granovetter, and Michael Schwartz. 1993. “Thomas Edison and the social construction of the early electricity industry in America.” in Swedberg, Richard ed., Explorations in Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.213-246.
33. McGuire, Patrick, Mark Granovetter, and Michael Schwartz (forthcoming). The Social Construction of Industry: Human Agency in the. Development, Diffusion, and Insitutionalization of the Electric Utility Industry.
34. McMahon, A. Michael. 1985. Reflections: A Centennial Essay on the Association of Edison Illuminating Companies. New York: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies.
35. National Industrial Conference Board. 1925. Trade Associations: Their Economic Significance and Legal Status. New York: National Industrial Conference Board.
36. Nye, David E. 1990. Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880-1940. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37. O'Brien, Patricia. 1994. “Governance systems in steel: the American and Japanese experience.” in Hollingsworth, Rogers, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck, ed., Governing Capitalist Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.43-71.
38. Passer, Harold. 1953. The Electrical Manufacturers, 1875-1900: A Study of Competition, Entrepreneurship, Technical Change, and Economic Growth. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Streeck, Wolfgang and Philippe C. Schmitter (ed.) 1985. Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
40. Temporary National Economic Committee. 1941. Investigation of Concentration of Economic Power: Trade Association Survey (Monograph No. 18). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
41. Traxler, Franz and Brigitte Unger. 1994. “Industry or infrastructure? A cross-national comparison of governance: Its determinants and economic consequences in the dairy sector.” in Hollingsworth, Rogers, Philippe C. Schmitter and Wolfgang Streeck, ed., Governing Capitalist Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.183-214.
42. US Dept. of Agriculture. 1916. Electric Power Development in US, 64th Congress, 1st session, Document #316, Senate, V-8, 9, 10. Washington: Government Printing Office.
43. US Dept. of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census. 1905. Census of The Electric Utility Industry-1902. Washington: Government Printing Office.
44. US Dept. of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census. 1910. Census of The Electric Utility Industry-1907. Washington: Government Printing Office.
45. US Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1915. Census of The Electric Utility Industry - 1912. Washington: Government Printing Office.
46. US Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1920. Census of The Electric Utility Industry - 1917. Washington: Government Printing Office.
47. US Dept. of Commerce (prepared by Warford, L.E. and Richard A. May). 1923. Trade Association Activities. Washington: Government Printing Office.
48. US Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1925. Census of The Electric Utility Industry - 1922. Washington: Government Printing Office.
49. United States Federal Trade Commission. 1927. Electric Power Industry: Control of Power Companies, FTC Re-Sen. 329, 69th Congress, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Serial Set 8703, S. Doc.213.
50. United States Federal Trade Commission. 1928. Electric Power Industry: Supply of Electrical Equipment and Competitive Conditions, FTC, Re-Sen, Res. 329, 70th Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. S.Doc.46.
51. United States Federal Trade Commission. 1934. Efforts by Associations and Agencies of Electric and Gas Utilities to Influence Public Opinion. Investigations of Utility Companies, FTC Summary Report to Senate, Re-Res. 83, to the 1st session, 70th Congress. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. S.Doc.92.
52. United States Federal Trade Commission. 1935. Investigations of Utility Companies - Laws and Regulation, part 73A, 70th Congress, 1st session, V-12. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
53. Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wasserman, Stanley and Dawn Iacobucci. 1988. “Sequential Social Network Data.” Psychometrika 53(2):261-282.
55. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Market and Hierarchy. New York: Free Press.
56. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economics of Institutions in Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
57. White, H.C., Boorman, S.A., and Breiger, R.L. 1976. “Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions.” American Journal of Sociology 81:730-779.