The implications of intellectual property law for the auditing and protection of national and international brands: Part I. Brands in cyberspace

Managerial Auditing Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 116-133

  Elsmore, M J ^a  

^a SOUTHAMPTON SOLENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Brands; Internet; Trademarks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993054377     PISSN: 02686902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02686900010319375     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Elsmore (1999) “European Trade Mark Protection Parts I and II – the Community Trade Mark” in Aspen Law & Business - The Licensing Journal, Summer 1999.
2. British Telecommunications plc v. One in a Million Ltd, Court of Appeal, 23 July 1998.
3. Harrods Ltd v, UK Network Services Ltd and Others, High Court, Chancery Division, 9 December 1996.
4. Harrods Ltd v. UK Network Services Ltd and Others, High Court Chancery Division, 9 December 1996.
5. Prince plc v. Prince Sports Group Inc., CH 1997-P-No. 2355 (decided 31 July 1997).
6. Pitman Training Ltd and PTC Oxford Ltd v. Nominet UK Ltd and Pearson Professional Ltd, High Court, Chancery Division, 22 May 1997.
7. D. Mecklermedia Corporation v. D.C. Congress GmbH [1998] Ch. 40; [1997] F.S.R. 627, High Court, Chancery Division.
8. Avnet Inc. v. Isoact Ltd [1998] F.S.R. 16.
9. Avnet Inc. v. Isoact Ltd [1997] E.T.M.R. 562.
10. Princetown v. Kaplan, 945 F. Supp. 1296 (US S. Ct. 1995).
11. Joshua Quittner, “Making a name on the Internet”, Newsday (US), 7 October 1994.
12. James W. Marcivitz (1995), “Ronald@McDonalds.com - Owning a bitchin' corporate trademark as an Internet address - infringement?”, 17 Cardozo Law Review, 85.
13. Panavision Inc. v. Toeppen, 945 F. Supp. 1296 (C.D. Cal. 1996).
14. Intermatic Inc. v. Toeppen, 947 F. Supp. 1227, 1233 (N.D.I11, 1996).
15. British Telecommunications plc v. One in a Million Ltd, Court of Appeal, 23 July 1998.
16. British Telecommunications plc v. One in a Million Ltd, High Court, Chancery Division, 28 November 1997.
17. Direct Line Group Ltd v. Direct Line Estate Agency Ltd [1997]; F.S.R. 374 Ch. D.
18. Glaxo plc v. Glaxowellcome Ltd [1996] E.S.R. 388, Ch. D.
19. Washington Speakers Bureau Inc. v. Leading Authorities Inc., US Distract Court for the Eastern District of Virginia 2 February 1999.
20. Laura Ashley Manufacturing BV v. Edizioni Blu Sri, Appeal Court (Parma), 22 February 1999.
21. “deta.com” from the District Court of Braunschweig, 5 August 1997.
22. “epson.de”, District Court of Dusseldorf, 4 April 1997.
23. “paulaner.de”, District of Monaco, 7 May 1997.
24. Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Network Solutions Inc., 985 F. Supp. 949, 953 (C.D. Cal. 1997).