Downloads, Logs and Captures: Evidence from Cyberspace

Journal of Financial Crime

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 138-151

  Sommer, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993047821     PISSN: 13590790     EISSN: 17587239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb025826     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Burditt v Roberts [1986] RTR 391.
2. Castle v Cross [1985] 1 All ER 87.
3. [1984] 1 WLR 1327.
4. McKeown v DPP (1995) Crim LR 69.
5. R v Burke (1990) Crim LR 288.
6. R v Pettigrew [1968] 2 All ER 195.
7. Sommer, P. ‘Clueless: Computer Forensics’, Secure Computing, November, pp. 15-21.
8. Wilding, E. (1997) ‘Computer Evidence: A Forensic Investigations Handbook’, Sweet & Maxwell, London, pp. 124-128.
9. R v Fellows, Times, 3rd October, 1996 (CA).
10. Drinkhall, J. (1997) ‘Internet Fraud’, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 242-244.
11. Akdeniz, Y. (1996) ‘Computer Pornography: A Comparative Study of the US and English Obscenity Laws and Child Pornography Laws in Relation to the Internet’, International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 235-261.
12. Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd and Lemon [1979] AC 617.
13. Schjolberg, S. (1996) ‘The Legal Framework — Unauthorised Access to Computer Systems’, presentation at the International Information Integrity Institute Conference, Oslo, 18th-20th June. Available at http://www.mossbyrett.of.no/info/legal.html.
14. Hance, O. (1996) ‘Business and Law on the Internet’, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 147-175.
15. Waelde, C. and Edwards, L. (1996) ‘Defamation and the Internet: A Case Study of Anomalies and Difficulties in the Information Age’, International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 263-294.
16. Hance, International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, pp. 105-111.
17. Reed, C. (1990-91) 2 CLSR 13-16.
18. R v Shephard [1993] AC 380.
19. R v Cochrane [1993] Crim LR 48.
20. Miller, C. (1992) ‘Electronic Evidence — Can You Prove the Transaction Took Place?’, Computer Lawyer, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 21-33.
21. Wright, B. (1995) ‘The Law of Electronic Commerce’, 2nd edn, Little Brown, Boston, p. 7.1.
22. Reed, (1990-91) CLSR 13-16.
23. Steventon, B. (1993) ‘The Ability to Challenge DNA Evidence’, Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Research Study No. 9, HMSO.
24. Alldridge, P., ‘Recognising Novel Scientific Techniques: DNA as a Test Case’, [1992] Crim LR 687 at pp. 689-691.
25. The Times, 14 August, 1996.
26. Alldridge, The Times.
27. R v Shephard [1993] 2 WLR 102.
28. Graham Smith analyses ‘The Web — The Challenge of the Virtual Document’ from the perspective of copyright law in (1996).
29. ‘The Future of Intellectual Property in an Online World’, Computers and Law, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 33-37.
30. Gringas, Computers and Law. Chapter 2 passim.
31. Grafinkel, S. and Spafford, G. (1997) ‘Web Security and Commerce’, O'Reilly & Associates, Chapters 6-19, 16.
32. Labour Party, Guardian, 10th December, 1996.
33. CIA, 30th September, 1996.
34. USAF, 30th December, 1996.
35. Cheswick, W. R. and Bellovin, S. M. (1994) ‘Firewalls and Internet Security: Repelling the Wily Hacker’, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, especially pp. 163-164.
36. Garfinkel and Spafford, MA, pp. 3-38.
37. Bevan, V. and Lidstone, K. (1996) ‘The Investigation of Crime: A Guide to Police Powers’, Butterworths, London, pp. 543-549.
38. Frye v US 293 F 1013 (DC Cir. 1923).
39. UPI, 29th March, 1996.
40. Washington Post, 30th March, 1996.
41. San Jose Mercury News, 30th March and 8th April, 1996.
42. Newsbytes, 5th April, 1996.