Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: The role of the editorial board

Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 168-182

  Parker, Lee D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Journal publishers; Publications; Quality; Research; Serials

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993030396     PISSN: 11766093     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/11766090710826628     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ALPSP and EASE (2000), Current Practice in Peer Review, Academy of Learned Societies for the Social Sciences, Brighton.
2. Alvesson, M. and Skoldberg, K. (2000), Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, Sage, London.
3. Colson, R.H. (2003), “Inside the journal”, The CPA Journal, Vol. 73 No. 2, p. 80.
4. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2000), “The discipline and practice of qualitative research”, in Ed. Denzin, N.K. and Ed. Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1-28.
5. Flick, U. (2002), An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Sage, London.
6. Glogoff, S. (1988), “Reviewing the gatekeepers: a survey of referees of library journals”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 400-7.
7. Gray, R., Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (2002), “Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship”, Accounting Forum, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1-30.
8. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (1996), “Editorial”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 3-6.
9. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (1997), “Celebration, reflection and a future: a decade of AAAJ”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 4-10.
10. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (2002), “Editorial”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 7-11.
11. Guthrie, J., Parker, L. and Gray, R. (2004a), “From thesis to publication”, in Ed. Burton, S. and Ed. Steane, P. (Eds), Surviving your Thesis and Staying Sane, Routledge Publishers, London, pp. 232-247.
12. Guthrie, J., Parker, L. and Gray, R. (2004b), “Requirements and understandings for publishing academic research: an insider view”, in Ed. Humphrey, C. and Ed. Lee, W. (Eds), Real Life Guide to Accounting Research, Elsevier Publishing Company, London, pp. 411-432.
13. Hamermesh, D.S. (1994), “Facts and myths about refereeing”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 153-163.
14. Hames, I. (2001), “Editorial boards: realising their potential”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 247-256.
15. Harrison, D. (2002), “Obligations and obfuscations in the review process”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46 No. 6, pp. 1079-84.
16. Jenson, J. (2005), “Structural factors and the quality of publication in social work journals”, Social Work Research, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 67-72.
17. Lee, T. (1997), “The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 11-30.
18. Marginson, S. and Considine, M. (2000), The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Parker, L.D. (2002), “It's been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13, pp. 603-619.
20. Parker, L.D. (2003), “Qualitative research in accounting and management: the emerging agenda”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 2, pp. 15-30.
21. Parker, L.D. (2004), “Qualitative research”, in Ed. Burton, S. and Ed. Steane, P. (Eds), Surviving your Thesis and Staying Sane, Routledge Publishers, London, pp. 159-177.
22. Parker, L.D. (2005), “Corporate governance crisis down under: post-enron accounting education and research inertia”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 383-394.
23. Parker, L. and Guthrie, J. (2005), “Welcome the ‘rough and tumble’: managing accounting research in a corporatised university world”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 5-13.
24. Parker, L.D., Guthrie, J. and Gray, R. (1998), “Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 371-402.
25. Peters, J. (1995), “The hundred years war started today: an exploration of electronic peer review”, Internet Research: Networking Applications and Policy, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 3-9.
26. Press, E. and Washburn, J. (2000), “The kept university”, The Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 285 No. 3, pp. 39-54.
27. Saunders, C. (2005), “Looking for diamond cutters”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. iii-viii.
28. Tight, M. (2003), “Reviewing the reviewers”, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 295-303.