Money Laundering, Criminal Assets and the 1998 Proposed Reforms

Journal of Financial Crime

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 325-332

  Gallant, M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993029666     PISSN: 13590790     EISSN: 17587239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb025902     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. ‘The Home Office Working Group on Confiscation, Third Report: Criminal Assets’, November 1998, Organised and International Crime Directorate (hereinafter Report).
2. Organised and International Crime Directorate. ‘Report on the Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986’, May 1991 and ‘Report on Part VI of the Criminal Justice Act 1988’, November 1992.
3. ‘The United Convention Against Illicit Drug Traffic, Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances’ (1989) 28 ITM 493.
4. Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986, c. 32.
5. Criminal Justice Act 1988, Part VI.
6. Criminal Justice Act 1993, Part III.
7. Proceeds of Crime Act 1995.
8. Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989, Part III.
9. ‘The Profits of Crime and Their Recovery’ (1984) Hodgson Report, Heineman, London.
10. Drug Trafficking Act 1994, ss. 49-53.
11. Criminal Justice Act 1993, Part III.
12. Proceeds of Crime Act 1995.
13. Criminal Justice Act 1993, s. 18.
14. Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s. 4.
15. Proceeds of Crime Act 1995, s. 1.
16. Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s. 4(5).
17. Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s. 43.
18. Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s. 2(8).
19. Criminal Justice Act 1993, Part III, s. 27.
20. Rider, B. (1996) ‘Taking the Profit out of Crime’ in B. Rider and M. Ashe (eds) ‘Money-Laundering Control’, p. 1.
21. Strong, B. (1995) ‘Civil Asset Recovery Procedures: How Equity Deters Fraud’, Company Lawyer, p. 44.
22. Currie, C. (1996) ‘Civil Enforcement as a Regulatory Device:: The Use of the Civil Law as a Means of Enforcing Securities Law Violations’, Journal of Financial Crime, p. 319.
23. Rider, B. (1995) ‘Civilising the Law — The Use of Civil and Administrative Proceedings to Enforce Financial Services Law’, Journal of Financial Crime, p. 11.
24. Customs & Excise Management Act 1979, s. 141.
25. Customs & Excise Management Act 1979, s. 68.
26. Mitchell v Torup (1766) 145 ER 764.
27. Dekeyser v British Railway Traffic and Electric Company (1936) 1 KB 224.
28. Attorney-General v Hunter (1949) 2 KB 110.
29. Commissioners of Customs & Excise v Jack Bradley (Accrington) Ltd (1958) 3 All ER 487.
30. Denton v John Lister Ltd and Another (1971) WLR 1426.
31. Allegemaine Gold-unde Silberscheideanstalt v Customs & Excise Commissioners (1980) 2 All ER 138.
32. Customs & Excise Commissioners v Air Canada (1991) 2 QB 446.
33. Air Canada v United Kingdom (1995) 20 EHRR 150.
34. Astol Calero-Toledo v Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. (1974) 40 L Ed 2d 452.
35. Bennis v Michigan (1996) 134 L Ed 2d 68.
36. Blumenson, E. (1998) ‘Policing for Profit: The Drug War's Hidden Economic Agenda’, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 65, p. 35.
37. Piety, T. (1991) ‘Scorched Earth: How the Expansion of Civil Forfeiture Doctrine Has Laid Waste to Due Process’, University of Miami Law Review, p. 911.
38. Schecter, M. (1990) ‘Fear and Loathing and the Forfeiture Laws’, Cornell Law Review, p. 1151.
39. Stahl, M. (1992) ‘Asset Forfeiture, Burdens of Proof and the War on Drugs’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, p. 274.
40. United States v Rural Route 1 Box 137-B (1994) F 3rd 845 at p. 848.
41. Austin v United States (1993) 125 L Ed 2d 488.
42. Ursery v United States (1996) 135 L Ed 2d 549.
43. Tilley v United States (1994) 18 F 3d 395.
44. Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act, HR 1965, s. 201(c).