Risk management trends in the Hong Kong construction industry: A comparison of contractors and owners perceptions

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 225-234

  Ahmed, Syed M ^a   Ahmad, Riaz ^a   Darshi de Saram, D ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Allocation; Construction; Hong Kong; Importance; Risk management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992973493     PISSN: 09699988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb021114     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Al-Bahar, J.F. & Crandall, K.C. (1990) Systematic risk management approach for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3), 533–546.
2. ASCE (1979) Construction risks and liability sharing. In: Proceedings: Construction Risk and Liability Sharing Conference, vols. I—II. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
3. Kangari, R. (1995) Risk management perceptions and trends of U.S. construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4), 422–429.
4. Raftery, J. (1994) Risk Analysis in Project Management. E & FN Spon, London.
5. Ren, H. (1994) Risk management: risk lifecycle and risk relationships on construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 12(2), 68–74.
6. Smith, RJ. & Gavin, V. (1998) Risk identification and allocation saving moitey by improving contracts and contracting practices. Presentation to the ASCE Hong Kong International Group and Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Hong Kong, March.
7. Thompson, P.A. & Perry, J.G. (1992) Engineering construction risks: a guide to project risk analysis and risk management. SERC Project Report, Thomas Telford Ltd, London.