An evaluation of a prolific offender project

Safer Communities

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 31-38

  Marlow, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intensive; Offenders; Partnership; Police; Probation; Prolific; Supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992954958     PISSN: 17578043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17578043200700014     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Duffin M (2006) Are drug and alcohol users getting the support they need to access suitable housing? Community Safety Journal 5 (3).
2. Graham J and Bowling B (1995) Young People and Crime. London: Home Office.
3. Home Office (2004a) Prolific and Other Offender Strategy Guidelines, Catch and Convict Framework. London: Home Office.
4. Home Office (2004b) Supplementary Guidance: Rehabilitate and resettle framework. London: Home Office.
5. Homes A, Walmsely R, Debidin M (2005) Intensive Supervision and Monitoring Schemes for Persistent Offenders: Staff and offender perceptions. London: Home Office.
6. Johns A (2003) Multi-agency Protocol: Bedfordshire shared services. Unpublished.
7. Matrix Research and NACRO (2004) Evaluation of Drug Testing in the Criminal Justice System. London: Home Office, HORS 286.
8. University of Huddersfield Applied Criminology Group (2003) The Tower Project. Unpublished.
9. Worrall A, Mawby RC, Heath G and Hope T (2003) Intensive Supervision and Monitoring Projects. London: Home Office, On-line Report 42/03.