An analysis of the AIS basket of top journals

Journal of Systems and Information Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 5-24

  Liu, Franklin ^a   Myers, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND BUSINESS SCHOOL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Information systems; Publications; Research methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992933456     PISSN: 13287265     EISSN: 17588847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13287261111118322     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Adams, D. and Johnson, N. (2008), “The journal list and its use: motivation, perceptions, and reality”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 17, pp. 158-62.
2. Alavi, M. and Carlson, P. (1992), “A review of MIS research and disciplinary development”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 45-62.
3. Baskerville, R.L. (2008), “For better or worse: how we apply journal ranking lists”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 17, pp. 156-7.
4. Chen, W.S. and Hirschheim, R. (2004), “A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 197-235.
5. Claver, E., Gonzalez, R. and Llopis, J. (2000), “An analysis of research in information systems (1981-1997)”, Information & Management, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 181-95.
6. Farhoomand, A.F. and Drury, D.H. (1999), “A Historiographical examination of information systems”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 1-27.
7. Farhoomand, A.F. and Drury, D.H. (2001), “Diversity and scientific progress in the information systems discipline”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 1-22.
8. Galliers, R.D. and Meadow, M. (2003), “A discipline divided: globalization and parochialism in information systems research”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 108-17.
9. Galliers, R.D. and Whitley, E.A. (2007), “Vive les differences? Developing a profile of European information systems research as a basis for international comparisons”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, pp. 20-35.
10. Hamilton, S. and Ives, B. (1982), “MIS research strategies”, Information & Management, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 339-47.
11. Hardgrave, B.C. and Walstrom, K.A. (1997), “Forums for MIS scholars”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40 No. 11, pp. 119-24.
12. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B. and Hong, S. (2003), “Objective quality ranking of computing journals”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46 No. 10, pp. 111-14.
13. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999), “A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 67-94.
14. Lending, D. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1992), “Update on MIS research: a profile of leading journals and US universities”, Data Base, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 5-11.
15. Lowry, P.B., Romans, D. and Curtis, A. (2004), “Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: a scientometric study of information systems journals”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 29-77.
16. Mingers, J. (2003), “The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 233-49.
17. Mylonpoulos, N.A. and Theoharakis, V. (2001), “Global perceptions of IS journals”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 44 No. 9, pp. 29-33.
18. Nord, J.H. and Nord, G.D. (1995), “MIS research: journal status assessment and analysis”, Information & Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 29-42.
19. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991), “Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-28.
20. Peffers, K. and Ya, T. (2003), “Identifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: ranking the journals”, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 63-84.
21. Richardson, H. and Robinson, B. (2007), “The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991-2001”, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 251-70.
22. Straub, D.W., Ang, S. and Evaristo, R. (1994), “Normative standards for IS research”, Data Base, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 21-34.
23. Valacich, J.S., Fuller, M.A., Schneider, C. and Dennis, A.R. (2006), “Publications opportunities in premier business outlets: how level is the playing field”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 107-25.
24. Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. and Glass, R.L. (2002), “Research in information systems: an empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 129-74.
25. Walsham, G. (1995), “Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 74-81.
26. Whitman, M.E., Hendrickson, A.R. and Townsend, A.M. (1999), “Research commentary. Academic rewards for teaching, research, and service: data and discourse”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 99-109.
27. Willcocks, L., Whitley, E.A. and Avgerou, C. (2008), “The ranking of top IS journals: a perspective from the London School of Economics”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 163-8.
28. Yin, R.K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.