Key Issues in Evaluation: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods and Research Design

Health Promotion Practice

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 20-23

  Francisco, Vincent T ^a   Butterfoss, Frances D ^b   Capwell, Ellen M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^c OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992905066     PISSN: 15248399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152483990100200105     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bernard, H. R. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
2. Butterfoss, F. D., Francisco, V., & Capwell, E. M. (2000). Choosing effective evaluation methods. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 307-314.
3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Cochran, W. G., & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
5. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Francisco, V. T., Capwell, E. M., & Butterfoss, F. (2000). Getting off to a good start with your evaluation. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 126-131.
7. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (Eds.). (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. In W. R. Shaddish (Ed.), New directions for program evaluation (Vol. 61, pp. 1-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.
10. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.