Participatory Evaluation Model for Coalitions: The Development of Systems Indicators

Health Promotion Practice

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 361-373

  Wallerstein, Nina ^a   Polascek, Michele ^b   Maltrud, Kristine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992897899     PISSN: 15248399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152483990200300306     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. The Aspen Institute. (1996). Measuring community capacity building: A workbook-in-progress for rural communities. Aspen, CO: The Aspen Institute Rural Economic Policy Program.
2. Baker, Q. E., Davis, D. A., Gallerani, R., Sanchez, V., & Viadro, C. (2000). An evaluation framework for community health programs. Durham, NC: The Center for the Advancement of Community Based Public Health.
3. Bauer, G. (1997). Community health indicators on the neighborhood level: A prototype for the Fruitvale/San Antonio area in Oakland. Oakland, CA: Oakland Community-Based Public Health Initiative.
4. Bracht, N. (1990). Health promotion at the community level. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Buckner, J. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771-791.
6. Burdine, J., Felix, M., Wallerstein, N., Abel, A., Wiltraut, C., Musselman, Y., et al. (1999). Measurement of social capital: Validation of a communitybased survey instrument [Abstract]. The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896, 393-395.
7. Butterfoss, F. D. (1998). Coalition effectiveness inventory self-assessment tool. Charleston, SC: Center for Pediatric Research and Center for Health Promotion.
8. Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 8(3), 315-330.
9. Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23(1), 65-79.
10. Butterfoss, F. D., Morrow, A. L., & Rosenthal, J. (1998). CINCH: An urban coalition for empowerment and action. Health Education and Behavior, 25(2), 212-225.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Framework for program evaluation in public health. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(RR-11), 1-40.
12. Chavis, D. M., Florin, P., Rich, R., & Wandersman, A. (1987). The role of block associations in crime control and community development: The Block Booster Project (Final Report to the Ford Foundation).
13. Chelimsky, E., & Shadish, W. R. (Eds.). (1997). Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Connell, J. P., Kubish, A. C., Schorr, L. B., & Weiss, C. H. (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts. New York: The Aspen Institute.
15. Conner, R., Tanjasiri, S., & Easterling, D. (1999). Communities tracking their quality of life. Denver: The Colorado Trust.
16. Cook, T. D. (1997). Lessons learned in evaluation over the past 25 years. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 30-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Crossroads Resource Center. (1999). Neighborhood sustainability indicators guidebook. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
18. Eng, E., & Parker, E. (1994). Measuring community competence in the Mississippi Delta: The interface between program evaluation and empowerment. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 199-220.
19. Eoyang, G. H., & Berkas, T. (1999). Evaluation in a complex adaptive system. In M. Lissack & H. Gunz (Eds.), Managing complexity in organizations: A view in many directions (pp.). Westport, CT: Quorum.
20. Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schults, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., et al. (1996). Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 161-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Fawcett, S. B., Sterling, T. D., Paine-Andrews, A., Harris, K. J., Francisco, V. T., Richter, K. P., et al. (1995). Evaluating community efforts to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
22. Francisco, V. T., Paine, A. L., Fawcett, S. B. (1993). A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 8(3), 403-416.
23. Fulbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A.C., Connell, J.P., (1998). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Washington DC: The Aspen Institute.
24. Gillies, P. (1997, July). The effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Working paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Health Promotion, Jakarta, Indonesia.
25. Goldstein, S. M. (1997). Community coalitions: A self-assessment tool. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(6), 430-435.
26. Goodman, R. (1999). Principals and tools for evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs. In R. C. Brownson, E. A. Baker, & L. F. Novick (Eds.), Community-based prevention: Programs that work (pp. 211-227). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
27. Goodman, R. M. (2000). Evaluation of community-based health programs: An alternate perspective. In N. Schneiderman, M. A. Speers, J. M. Silva, H. Tomes, & J. H. Gentry (Eds.), Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health (pp. 293-304). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Goodman, R. M., Speers, M. A., McLeroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E., et al. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education and Behavior, 25(3), 258-278.
29. Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1994). FORECAST: A formative approach to evaluating community coalitions and community-based initiatives. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(2), 6-25.
30. Goodman, R. M., Wandersman, A., Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Morrissey, E. (1996). An ecological assessment of community-based interventions for prevention and health promotion: Approaches to measuring community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 33-61.
31. Green, L. W., George, M. A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C. J., Herbert, C. J., Bowie, W. R., et al. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion: Review and recommendations for the development of participatory re-search in health promotion in Canada. Vancouver: The Royal Society of Canada.
32. Guba, E. S., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Helitzer, D. (2000). Coalition member survey. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, Office of Evaluation.
34. Himmelman, A. T., Luxenberg, M. G., & Schmitz, C. C. (1995). Consortium Activities Diagnostic Survey (CADS): A tool to understand the ways that groups work together. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Urban and Regional Affairs.
35. Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schultz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 149-170.
36. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Reviews Public Health, 19, 173-202.
37. Kaftarian, S. J., & Hansen, W. B. (Eds.). (1994). Community partnership program, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention [Special issue]. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(2).
38. Kass, D., & Freudenberg, N. (1997). Coalition building to prevent childhood lead poisoning: A case study for New York City. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 278-290). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income equality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1491-1497.
40. Kegler, M., Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., & Malek, S. (1998). Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of 10 project assist coalitions in North Carolina. Health Education and Behavior, 25(3), 338-353.
41. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1998). W. K. Kellogg Foundation evaluation handbook. Battle Creek, MI: Author.
42. Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., Prothrow-Stith, D., Lochner, K., & Gupta, V. (1998). Social capital income inequality and firearm violent crime. Social Science Medicine, 47, 7-17.
43. Kreuter, M., & Lezin, N. (1998). Are consortia/collaboratives effective in changing health status and health systems? Atlanta, GA: Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Legislation.
44. Kreuter, M. W., Lezin, N. A., & Young, L. A. (2000). Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 49-63.
45. Kreuter, M., Young, L., & Lezin, N. (1998). Measuring social capital in small communities (Research Report). Atlanta, GA: Health 2000.
46. Laraque, D., Barlow, B., Durkin, M., & Heagarty, M. (1995). Injury prevention in an urban setting: Challenges and successes. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 72, 16-30.
47. Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179-205.
48. Linney, J., & Wandersman, A. (1991). Prevention Plus III: Assessing alcohol and other drug prevention programs at the school and community level; a four-step guide to useful program assessment. Rockville, MD: Office for Substance Abuse Prevention.
49. Maltrud, K., Polacsek, M., & Wallerstein, N. (1997). Participatory evaluation workbook for community initiatives. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, Masters in Public Health Program.
50. Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work: A review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
51. McQueen, D. (2000, June). Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion: Technical report 1. Paper presented at the Fifth Global Conference on Health Promotion, Mexico City.
52. McQueen, D. V., & Anderson, L. (2000). What counts as evidence? Issues and debates on evidence relevant to the evaluation of community health promotion programs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
53. Minkler, M. (1997). Community organizing and community building for health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
54. Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (1997). Improving health through community organization and community building. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education theory, research, and practice (pp. 241-269). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
55. National Civic League. (1999). The civic index: Measuring your community’s civic health. Denver, CO: Author.
56. Norris, T. (1997). The community indicators handbook: Redefining progress. Boulder, CO: Tyler Norris Associates.
57. Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition. (1999). Pathways to a healthy community: An indicators and evaluation tool kit. Toronto, Canada: Author.
58. Parker, E. A., Eng, E., Laraia, B., Ammerman, A., Dodds, J., Margolis, L., et al. (1998). Coalition building for prevention: Lessons learned from the North Carolina community-based public health initiative. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 2(4), 25-36.
59. Parker, E. A., Lichtenstein, R. L., Schultz, A. J., Israel, B. A., Schork, M., Steinman, K. J., et al. (2001). Disentangling measures of individual perceptions of community social dynamics: Results of a community survey. Health Education and Behavior, 28(4), 462-486.
60. Pierce Oroz, G. (1993). Mora Valley: Pioneering healthier communities in New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, Masters in Public Health Program.
61. Plough, A., & Olafson, F. (1994). Implementing the Boston Healthy Start Initiative: A case study of community empowerment and public health. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 221-234.
62. Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partner-ships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369-402.
63. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
64. Scharmen, T., & Wallerstein, N. (1996). Evaluation follow-up of twelve healthier communities initiatives (Report to the Department of Health, University of New Mexico, Masters in Public Health Program).
65. Schorr, L. B. (1997). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Doubleday.
66. Sofaer, S., & Kenney, E. (1996). A survey tool for coalition self assessment. Washington, DC: Center for Health Outcomes Improvement Research, George Washington University Medical Center.
67. Stevenson, J. F., Mitchell, R. E., & Florin, P. (1996). Evaluation and self-direction in community prevention coalitions. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 208-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Wallerstein, N. (1999). Power between evaluator and community: Research relationships within New Mexico’s healthier communities. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 39-53.
69. Wandersman, A., Goodman, R., & Butterfoss, F. (1997). Understanding coalitions and how they operate. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 261-277). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
70. Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
71. World Health Organization. (1998). Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policymakers. Copenhagen, Denmark: Author.