The Australian waterfront dispute and theories of the state

Journal of Industrial Relations

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 497-516

  Dabscheck, Braham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992882792     PISSN: 00221856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002218560004200402     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Agreement Between Patrick Stevedores Holdings Pty Limited; The Maritime Union of Australia; The Australian Maritime Officers Union; The Communications Electrical and Plumbing Union and The Australian Council of Trade Unions 1998, 15 June (mimeo).
2. Almond G.A. 1988, ‘The Return to the State’, American Political Science Review, 82(3): 853-74.
3. Atleson, J.B. 1985, ‘Reflections on Labor, Power, and Society’, Maryland Law Review, 44(3): 841-72.
4. Australian Industrial Relations Commission 1998, The Maritime Union of Australia v. Patrick No. 1 Pty Limited and Patrick No. 2 Pty Limited, Commissioner Mahon, S0283 Dec 407/98 M Print P9970, 3 April.
5. Baker, D. 1998, ‘Trade Unionism and the Policing “Accord”: Control and Self-Regulation of Picketing during the 1998 Maritime Dispute’, Paper Presented at ‘Unions in Crisis’, National Key Centre for Industrial Relations Conference, Monash University, July (mimeo).
6. Bauman, R.W. 1996, Critical Legal Studies: A Guide to the Literature, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
7. Bell, S. 1994, ‘Statist Analysis’, in A. Parkin, J. Summers and D. Woodward, (eds), Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia, fifth edition, Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
8. Blumberg, P.I. 1986, ‘Limited Liability and Corporate Groups’, Journal of Corporation Law, 11 (4): 573-631.
9. Bramble, T. 1998, ‘War on the Waterfront’, Brisbane Defend Our Unions Committee, November (mimeo).
10. Conaghan, J. 1987, ‘Critical Labour Law: The American Contribution’, Journal of Law and Society, 14(3): 334-52.
11. Creighton, W.B., Ford, W.J. and Mitchell, R.J. 1993, Labour Law: Text and Materials, second edition, Sydney: Law Book Company.
12. Dabscheck, B. 1983a, ArbitratorAt Work: Sir William Raymond Kelly and the Regulation of Australian Industrial Relations, Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
13. Dabscheck, B. 1983b, ‘Of Mountains and Routes Over Them: A Survey of Theories of Industrial Relations’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(4): 485-506.
14. Dabscheck, B. 1993, ‘Regulation Down Under: The Case of Australian Industrial Relations’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXVII(1): 41-68.
15. Dabscheck, B. 1995, The Struggle for Australian Industrial Relations, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
16. Dabscheck, B. 1998, ‘The Waterfront Dispute: Of Vendetta and the Australian Way’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 9(2): 155-87.
17. Document, 1997, ‘Waterfront Strategy’, in [Australian Council of Trade Unions] Patrick-MUA Dispute Documentation (mimeo).
18. Finkin, M.W. 1984, ‘Revisionism in Labor Law’, Maryland Law Review, 43(1): 23-92.
19. Finkin, M.W. 1985, ‘Does Karl Klare Protest Too Much?’ Maryland Law Review, 44(4): 1100-10.
20. Forbath, W.E. 1989, ‘The Shaping of the American Labor Movement’, Harvard Law Review, 102(6): 1109-256.
21. Giles, A. 1989, ‘Industrial Relations Theory, the State and Politics’, in J. Barbash and K. Barbash (eds), Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
22. Gillespie, D. 1997a, Minute: ‘Meetings with Stevedoring Employers’, 10 March, in [Australian Council of Trade Unions] Patrick-MUA Dispute Documentation (mimeo).
23. Gillespie, D. 1997b, Minute: ‘Waterfront—Technical Discussions—P&O Ports + Patricks’, 14 April, in [Australian Council of Trade Unions] Patrick-MUA Dispute Documentation (mimeo).
24. Glasbeek, H.E. 1998, ‘The MUA Affair: The Role of Law vs. The Rule of Law’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 9(2): 188-221.
25. Godard, J. 1993, ‘Theory and Method in Industrial Relations: Modernist and Postmodernist Approaches’, in R. J. Adams and N. M. Meltz (eds), Industrial Relations Theory: Its Nature, Scope and Pedagogy, Metuchen: The Scarecrow Press.
26. Griffin, G. and Svensen, S. 1998, ‘Industrial Relations Implications of the Australian Waterfront Dispute’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 24(3): 194-206.
27. Hadden, T. 1992, ‘The Regulation of Corporate Groups in Australia’, University ofNew South Wales Law Journal, 15(1): 61-85.
28. Hall, D.R. 1982. ‘Commonwealth Controls with Respect to Victimisation of Employees’, Australian Law Journal, 56(4): 176-88.
29. Harcourt, T. 1998, ‘The Economics of the Australian Waterfront Dispute’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 9(2): 222-35.
30. Head, B. and Bell, S. 1994, ‘Understanding the Modern State: Explanatory Approaches ’, in S. Bell and B. Head (eds), State, Economy and Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
31. Hill, J. 1995, ‘At the Frontiers of Labour Law and Corporate Law: Enterprise Bargaining, Corporations and Employees’, Federal Law Review, 23(2): 204-25.
32. Houlihan, P. 1998, ‘Paul Houlihan on the 1998 Waterfront Dispute’, Paper Presented to the XIXth Conference of the H. R. Nicholls Society ‘MUA—Here to Stay…Today’, 31 July-2 August (mimeo)
33. Hyman, R. 1975, Industrial Relations: A Marxist Introduction, London: Macmillan.
34. Jessop, B. 1990, ‘Putting States in their Place: State Systems and State Theory’, in A. Leftwich (ed.), New Developments in Political Science: An International Review of Achievements and Prospects, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
35. Klare, K.E. 1978, ‘Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937-1941’, Minnesota Law Review, 62: 265-339.
36. Klare, K.E. 1981, ‘Labor Law as Ideology: Toward a new Historiography of Collective Bargaining Law’, Industrial Relations Law Journal, 4(3): 450-82.
37. Klare, K.E. 1982, ‘The Public/Private Distinction in Labor Law’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 130(6): 1358-422.
38. Klare, K.E. 1985a, ‘Traditional Labor Law Scholarship and the Crisis of Collective Bargaining Law: A Reply to Professor Finkin’, Maryland Law Review, 44(3): 731-840.
39. Klare, K.E. 1985b, ‘Lost Opportunity: Concluding Thoughts on the Finkin Critique’, Maryland Law Review, 44(4): 1111-23.
40. Klare, K.E. 1990, ‘Critical Theory and Labor Relations Law’, in D. Kairys (ed.), The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, revised edition, New York: Pantheon Books.
41. Lipton, P. and Herzberg, A. 1999, Understanding Company Law, eighth edition, Sydney: LBC Information Services.
42. Littler, C.R. 1993, ‘Industrial Relations Theory: A Political Economy Perspective ’, in R. J. Adams and N. M. Meltz (eds), Industrial Relations Theory: Its Nature, Scope And Pedagogy, Metuchen: The Scarecrow Press.
43. Lowi, T.J. 1988, ‘The Return to the State: Critiques’, American Political Science Review, 82(3): 885-91.
44. MacDermott, T. 1997, ‘Industrial Legislation In 1996: The Reform Agenda’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(1): 52-76.
45. Maritime Union of Australia and Others v. Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Pty Ltd and Others. 1998, Justice North, Federal Court of Australia, 21 April, 79 Industrial Reports, 281.
46. Maritime Union of Australia and Others v. Patrick Stevedores Operations Pty Ltd and Another, 1998, Justices Winneke, Brooking and Charles, Supreme Court of Victoria—Court of Appeal, 28 April, 79 Industrial Reports, 317.
47. Martin, C.J. 1989, ‘Business Influence and State Power: The Case of US Corporate Tax Policy’, Politics and Society, 17(2): 189-224.
48. McCallum, R. 1998, ‘A Priority of Rights: Freedom of Association and the Waterfront Dispute’, Australian Bulletin of Labour, 24(3): 207-21.
49. McCallum, R.C., Pittard, M.J. and Smith, G.F. 1990, Australian Labour Law: Cases and Materials, second edition, Sydney: Butterworths.
50. Nolan, D. R. (ed.) 1998, The Australasian Labour Law Reforms: Australia and New Zealand at the End of the Twentieth Century, Sydney: Federation Press.
51. Nordlinger, E.A. 1981, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
52. Nordlinger, E.A. 1987, ‘Taking the State Seriously’, in M. Weiner and S. P. Huntington (eds), Understanding Political Development, Boston : Little, Brown & Company.
53. Nordlinger, E.A. 1988, ‘The Return to the State: Critiques’, American Political Science Review, 82(3): 875-85.
54. O'Donovan, J. 1977, ‘Give up your Claim or Give up your Billet: Legal Remedies for Victimised Trade Unionists in Australia’, Federal Law Review, 8(2): 141-63.
55. Orr, G. 1998, ‘Conspiracy on the Waterfront’, Australian Journal of Labour Law, 11(3): 159-85.
56. Patrick Melbourne Enterprise Agreement 1996 (mimeo).
57. Patrick Stevedores No. 1 Limited and Another v. Maritime Union of Australia and Others, 1998, Vice President Ross, Australian Industrial Relations Commission, 13 February, 79 Industrial Reports, 239.
58. Patrick Stevedores No 1 Limited and Another v. Maritime Union of Australia and Others, 1998, Justice Beach, Supreme Court of Victoria, 23 February, 79 Industrial Reports, 268.
59. Patrick Stevedores No. 2 Pty Ltd and Others v. Maritime Union of Australia and Others, 1998, Justices Wilcox, von Doussa and Finkelstein, Full Court of Federal Court of Australia, 2 3 April, 79 Industrial Reports, 305.
60. Patrick Stevedores Operations No. 2 Pty Ltd and Others v. Maritime Union of Australia, 1998, Chief Justice Brennan, Justices Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan, High Court of Australia, 4 May, 79 Industrial Reports, 339.
61. Patrick Stevedores Operations Pty Limited and Others v. Maritime Union of Australia and Others, 1998, Justice Beach, Supreme Court of Victoria, 20 April, 79 Industrial Reports, 276.
62. Patrick Stevedores Operations Pty Limited v. Maritime Union of Australia and Others, 1998, Chief Justice Wood, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 20 April, 82 Industrial Reports, 237.
63. Patrick Stevedores Operations Pty Limited and Another v. Maritime Union of Australia and Others, 1998, Justice Parker, Supreme Court of Western Australia, 23 April, 82 Industrial Reports, 87.
64. Productivity Commission, 1998a, International Benchmarking Of The Australian Waterfront, Canberra.
65. Productivity Commission, 1998b, Work Arrangements In Container Stevedoring, Canberra.
66. Sheil, C. (ed.) 1998, War on the Wharves: A Cartoon History, Sydney: Pluto Press.
67. Skocpol, T. 1985, ‘Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research’, in P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds), Bringing The State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Sloan, J. 1998, ‘An Economic Analysis of the 1998 Patrick Dispute’, Economic and Labour Relations Review, 9(2): 236-45.
69. Stevedoring Industry Award 1991 (mimeo).
70. Stone, K.V.W. 1981, ‘The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law’, Yale Law Journal, 90(7): 1509-80.
71. Stone, K.V.W. 1986, ‘Re-Envisioning Labor Law: A Response to Professor Finkin ’, Maryland Law Review, 45(4): 978-1013.
72. Svensen, S. 1998, ‘The Australian Wharf Lockout’, Capital and Class, 66: 1-11.
73. Sydney Morning Herald.
74. de Tocqueville, A. 1966, Democracy In America, vol. 1, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
75. Waterfront Industry Reform Authority 1992, Final Report, Canberra.
76. Weeks, P. 1995, Trade Union Security Law: A Study of Preference and Compulsory Unionism, Sydney: The Federation Press.
77. Williams, G. 1998, Labour Law And The Constitution, Sydney : The Federation Press.
78. Wilson, J. Q. (ed.) 1980, The Politics Of Regulation, New York: Basic Books.
79. Wiseman, J. 1998, ‘Here To Stay? The 1997-1998 Australian Waterfront Dispute and its Implications’, Labour and Industry, 9(1): 1-16.
80. Zeitlin, J. 1985, ‘Shop Floor Bargaining and the State: A Contradictory Relationship’, in S. Tolliday and J. Zeitlin (eds), Shop Floor Bargaining And The State: Historical And Comparative Perspectives, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.