Infrastructure Planning in an Uncertain Environment: The Nation's Former Nuclear Weapons Production Sites

Public Works Management & Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 138-154

  Mayer, Henry J ^a   Greenberg, Michael R ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992882334     PISSN: 1087724X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108772402236955     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brewer, L. (Ed.). (1997). Public works administration: Current public policy perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Buffington, J. E. (1998). Preface to Stewardship of federal facilities: A proactive strategy for managing the nation's public assets. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
3. Choate, P., & Walter. S. (1981). America in ruins: Beyond the public works pork barrel. Washington, DC: Council of State Planning Agencies.
4. Farazmand, A. (Ed.). (2001). Privatization or public reform? International case studies with implications for public management. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
5. Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board. (1997, February 28). Statement of federal financial accounting standards No. 6: Accounting for property, plant, and equipment(Vol. 1, Version 1.0). Washington, DC: Author.
6. Gupta, A. (2000). Beyond privatization. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7. Ireland, D. (1992). Stewardship and the kingdom of God: An historical, exegetical, and contextual study of the parable of the unjust steward in Luke 16: 1-13. New York: E. J. Brill.
8. Kaplan, M. (1988). Infrastructure needs assessment: Methodological problems and opportunities. In J. M. Stein (Ed.), Public infrastructure planning and management. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Kemp, R. (Ed.). (1991). Privatization: The provision of public services by the private sector. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
10. Kocheisen, C. (2002). NLC seeks more federal funds for drinking water infrastructure. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
11. Launius, R. (1995). AWestern Mormon in Washington, D.C.: James C. Fletcher, NASA, and the final frontier. Pacific Historical Review, 64, 217-241.
12. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (2000). LLNL comprehensive site plan: Synopsis. Retrieved from www.llnl.gov/comp_plan
13. Lee, T. R. (1999). Water management in the 21st century: The allocation imperative(New Horizons in Environmental Economic Series). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
14. Lewis, D., Mayer, H., & Greenberg, M. (2002, March). Contracting for DOE environmental management cleanup: A reviewof principles, practices, and a role for CRESP (CRESP Social and Economic Center Report 59). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
15. Little, R. (1999). Educating the infrastructure professional: A new curriculum for a new discipline. Public Works Management & Policy, 4(2), 93-99.
16. Lowrie, K., & Greenberg, M. (2000, November). The meaning of stewardship: Implications for DOE long-term stewardship planning (CRESP Social and Economic Center Report 39). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
17. MacAvoy, P. (Ed.). (1995, Autumn). Deregulation and privatization in the United States: Hume papers on public policy(Vol. 3, No. 3). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
18. National League of Cities. (2001). The state of America's cities: The seventeenth annual opinion survey of municipal elected officials. Washington, DC: Author.
19. National Research Council. (1995). Improving the environment: An evaluation of DOE's environmental management program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. National Research Council. (1998). Stewardship of federal facilities: A proactive strategy for managing the nation's public assets. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. National Research Council. (1999). Improving project management in the Department of Energy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
22. National Research Council. (2000). Long-term institutional management of U.S. Department of Energy legacy waste sites. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Office of Environmental Management. (1995). Closing the circle on splitting the atom. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management.
24. Office of Management and Budget. (1992), Circular No. A-94 revised (Transmittal Memo No. 64): Memorandum for heads of executive departments and establishments. Retrieved October 29, 1992, from www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ circulars/a094/a095.html
25. O'Leary, H. (1994). Stewards of a national resource(DOE/FM-0002). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
26. Purcell, R. (1998). Values for value: Integrity and stewardship. Vital Speeches of the Day, 64(24), 763-766.
27. Savannah River Site.(2000a, October 26). SRS infrastructure restoration plan. Savannah River, SC: Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
28. Savannah River Site.(2000b, December). SRS long range comprehensive plan(Discussion draft). Savannah River, SC: Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
29. Smith, A. J. (1999). Privatized infrastructure: The role of government. London: Thomas Telford.
30. U.S. Army.(2002, February). Deputy chief of staff for installations: Our vision for enduring installations (Bulletin No. 02-1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Army, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports.
31. U.S. Department of Energy. (1997, October). 3.0 national planning guidance. In 2006 plan guidance: Guidance to be used in developing the draft accelerating cleanup: Paths to closure. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management.
32. U.S. Department of Energy.(1998, February). Accelerating cleanup: Paths to closure. Washington, DC: Author.
33. U.S. Department of Energy. (1999, June 15). Management report: Audit of the Department of Energy's consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 1998. Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General.
34. U.S. Department of Energy. (2000a, November). Management challenges at the Department of Energy(Special Report by the Office of Inspector General). Washington, DC: Office of Audit Services.
35. U.S. Department of Energy. (2000b). Status report on paths to closure March 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management. Retrieved from www.em.gov/closure/fy2000
36. U.S. Department of Energy. (2001, January). A report to Congress on long-term stewardship: Volume I. Summary report. Washington, DC: Office of Long-Term Stewardship.
37. U.S. Department of Energy. (2002, February). Reviewof the environmental management program. Areport presented to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management by the Top-To-Bottom Review Team.
38. U.S. Department of Interior. (1999). FY 1999 DOI annual accountability report. Retrieved from www.doi.gov/pfin/ acct99
39. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998, December). Executive fuide: Leading practices in capital decision making(GAO/AMID-99-32). Washington, DC: Accounting and Information Management Division.
40. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1999, April). Nuclear waste: DOE's accelerated cleanup strategy has benefits but faces uncertainties. Report to Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives.
41. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000, June 22). Nuclear waste: Observations on DOE's privatization initiative for complex cleanup projects. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives.
42. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001, December). Fundamental reassessment needed to address major mission, structure, and accountability problems. Report to the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives.
43. Walker, C., & Smith, A. J. (Eds.). (1995). Privatized infrastructure: The build operate transfer approach. London: Thomas Telford.