Researching Subjectivity and Diversity: Q-Methodology in Feminist Psychology

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 267-276

  Kitzinger, Celia ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992863287     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00358.x     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Bem D. J. Funder D. C. (1978). Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychological Review, 84, 485–501
2. Bem D. J. Lord C. G. (1979). Template matching: A proposal for probing the ecological validity of experimental settings in social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 833–846
3. Block J. (1955). The difference between Q and R. Psychological Review, 62, 356–358
4. Block J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas
5. Brown S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q-methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
6. Butler R. Haigh T. (1954). Changes in the relation between self-concepts, and ideal concepts consequent upon client-centered counseling. In Rogers C. R., Dymond R. F.,(Eds.), Psychotherapy and personality change (pp. 72–89). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
7. Condor S. (1986). Sex role beliefs and “traditional” women: Feminist, and intergroup perspectives. In Wilkinson S.,(Ed.), Feminist social psychology (pp. 97–118). Milton Keynes: Open University Press
8. Curt B. (pseud.). (1994). Textuality and techtonics: Troubling social and psychological science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
9. Furnham A. (1994). Explaining health and illness: Lay perceptions on current and future health, the causes of illness and the nature of recovery. Social Science and Medicine, 39, 715–725
10. Kaye L. W. (1947). Frames of reference in “pro” and “anti” evaluations of test items. Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 63–68
11. Kitzinger C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage
12. Roiser M. (1974). Asking silly questions. In Armistead N.,(Ed.), Reconstructing social psychology (pp. 75–92). Harmondsworth: Penguin
13. Stainton Rogers R. Kitzinger C. (1995). A decalogue of human rights: What happens when you let the people speak. Social Science Information, 34, 87–106
14. Stainton Rogers R. Stenner P. Gleeson K. Stainton Rogers W. (1995). Social psychology: A critical agenda. Cambridge: Polity
15. Stainton Rogers W. (1991). Explaining health and illness: An exploration of diversity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf
16. Stephenson W. (1935). Techniques of factor analysis. Nature, 136, 297
17. Stephenson W. (1936a). The inverted factor technique. British Journal of Psychology, 22, 344–361
18. Stephenson W. (1936b). A new application of correlation to averages. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 43–57
19. Stephenson W. (1972). Applications of communication theory: II—Interpretations of Keats' “Ode on a Grecian Urn.” Psychological Record, 22, 177–192
20. Stephenson W. (1978a). The shame of science. Ethics in Science and Medicine, 5, 25–38
21. Stephenson W. (1978b). The importance of factors in Q-methodology: Statistical and theoretical considerations. Operant Subjectivity, 1, 117–124