Foreword: Incorporating the Summary of Performance Into Transition Planning

Career Development for Exceptional Individuals

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 67-69

  Ward, Michael J ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992861856     PISSN: 08857288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/08857288060290020501     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
2. Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Wagner, M. (2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities. A Special Topic Report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved February 6, 2006, from www.nlts2.org/pdfs/transitionplanningcomplete.pdf.
3. DeStefano, L., Heck, D., Hassazi, S., & Furney, K. (1999). Enhancing the implementation of the transition requirements of IDEA: A report on the Policy Forum on Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22, 85–99.
4. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. $ 1400 et seq. (1990)(amended 1997)
5. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. $ 1400 et seq. (2004)(reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1990)
6. Johnson, D.R., & Halloran, W.H. (1997). The federal legislative context and goals of the state systems change initiative on transition for youth with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 20, 109–121.
7. National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. (2000). National survey of educational support provision to students with disabilities in postsecondary education settings: Technical report. Honolulu, HI: Author.
8. National Center for Secondary Education and Transition. (2004). Current challenges facing the future of secondary education and transition services for youth with disabilities in the United States. Retrieved February 6, 2006, from http://www.ncset.org/publications/discussionpaper/default.asp
9. National Organization on Disability. (2004). Landmark disability survey finds pervasive disadvantages. Retrieved February 12, 2006, from http://www.nod.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.viewPage&pageID=1430&nodeID=1&FeatureID=1422&redirected=1&CFID=2882460&CFTOKEN=69278533
10. Powers, K.M., Gil-Kashiwabara, E., Geenen, S.J., Powers, L.E., Balandran, J., & Palmer, C. (2005). Mandates and effective transition planning practices reflected in IEPs. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28, 47–59.
11. Storms, J., O'Leary, E., & Williams, J. (2000). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997: A guide for states, districts, schools, universities and families. Minneapolis, MN: National Transition Network. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED441324)
12. Ward, M.J., & Berry, H.G. (2005, fall). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: Accommodations received and needed (Information from HEATH). Retrieved December 22, 2005, from www.heath.gwu.edu/newsletter/Issue%2015/Students%20with%20Disabilities%20in%20Postsecondary%20Education.htm
13. West, L.L., Corby, S., Boyer-Stephens, A., Jones, B., Miller, R.J., & Sarkees-Wircenski, M. (1999). Integrating transition planning into the IEP process (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.