Prisoners As Citizens: A Comparative View

Probation Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 130-139

  Stern, Baroness Vivien ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992838160     PISSN: 02645505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026455050204900207     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. About the Prison and Probation Service in Sweden (2000), www.kvv.se
2. Braggins, J. (2001) Shared Responsibilities: Education for Prisoners at a Time of Change, NATFHE and the Association of Colleges.
3. Canadian Correctional Service (2002) Programs for Families of Offenders, Private Family Visiting Program, www.cse-scc.gc.ca
4. Council of Europe (1987) Committee Of Ministers, Recommendation no. r (87) 3 on the European Prison Rules. Strasbourg: C of E.
5. Council of Europe, (2001) Report to the Latvian Government on the Visit to Latvia carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 24 January to 3 February 1999. Strasbourg: C of E.
6. de la Cuesta, J.L. and Blanco, I. 2001) ‘Spain’, in D. van Zyl Smit and F. Dunkel (Eds) Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow. Kluwer.
7. Department of Health, HM Prison Service, The National Assembly for Wales (2001) Prison Health Policy Unit and Task Force, Prison Health Handbook: 3.
8. Department of Justice Canada (2000) Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? The Right to Vote for Inmates. www.Canada.justice.gc.ca
9. Drinan, R. (2000) ‘Let Prisoners Keep the Right to Vote’, in the Boston Globe 14 July.
10. Duguid, S. (2000) Can Prisons Work? The Prisoner as Object and Subject in Modern Corrections. University of Toronto Press.
11. Giménez-Salinas, E. (1999) ‘Spain’ in D. van Zyl Smit, and F. Dunkel (Eds) Prison Labour: Salvation or Slavery? Ashgate.
12. House of Lords (2000) Official Report, 27 June 2000 Cols 820-849.
13. House of Lords 2002, Official Report, 2 March 2002, Col 391.
14. Human Rights Watch and the Sentencing Project (1998) United States: Losing the Vote.
15. ICPS (2000) Re-offending by Exprisoners: A Report for the Social Exclusion Unit. Unpublished Report.
16. IGLHRC 2001 Columbian Supreme Court in Favor of Conjugal Visits for Lesbian Inmate, Press Release, 23 October 2001.
17. Levenson, J. (2001) Barred from Voting. London: Prison Reform Trust.
18. Ministry of Justice (1998) Danish Prison and Probation Service. Copenhagen.
19. Pilgram, A. (1999) ‘Austria’ in D. van Zyl Smit, and F. Dunkel (Eds) Prison Labour: Salvation or Slavery? Ashgate.
20. Shankardass, R.D. and Others (2000) Workshop on New Models of Accessible Justice: the India Experience. Penal Reform and Justice Association (PRAJA).
21. Stando-Kawecka, B. (2001) ‘Poland’ in D. van Zyl Smit and F. Dunkel (Eds), Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow. Kluwer.
22. Stern, V. (1987) Bricks of Shame: Britain’s Prisons. Penguin
23. Stern, V. (1998) A Sin Against the Future: Imprisonment in the World. Northeastern University Press.
24. Stern, V. (2002, forthcoming) ‘Prisoners as Citizens: A View from Europe’, in David Brown and Meredith Wilkie (Eds) Prisoners as Citizens. Sydney: The Federation Press, and UK: Willan Publishing.
25. Uss, A. and Pergataia A. (2001) ‘Russia’, in D. van Zyl Smit and F. Dunkel (Eds) Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow. Kluwer.
26. van Hofer, H. and Marvin, R. (2001) ‘Sweden’ in D. van Zyl Smit and F. Dunkel (Eds) Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow. Kluwer.
27. van Zyl Smit, D. and Dunkel, F. (Eds) (2001) Imprisonment Today and Tomorrow. Kluwer.
28. Whiting, B. (2002) ‘Can Prison Inmate Mail Sperm to Wife?’ in The Arizona Republic, 20 March 2002.