Comments on “Subject to Romance”

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 369-374

  Marecek, Jeanne ^a  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992830756     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00367.x     Document Type: Note

References (22)

1. Allen K. Baber K. M. (1992). Ethical and epistemological tensions in applying a postmodern perspective to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 1–16
2. Bohan J. (1995, August). Every answer is a question. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA
3. Bohan J. S. (1993). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism, and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 5–22
4. Crawford M. (1995). Talking difference. London: Sage
5. Crawford M. Marecek J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female, 1968–1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–165
6. Fox-Genovese E. (1991). Feminism without illusions: A critique of individualism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press
7. Gavey N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to a feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 459–475
8. Gavey N. McPhillips K. (1999). Subject to romance: Heterosexual passivity as an obstacle to women initiating condom use. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 349–367
9. Hare-Mustin R. T. Marecek J. (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
10. Hare-Mustin R. T. Marecek J. (1994). Asking the right questions: Feminist psychology and sex differences. Feminism and Psychology, 4, 531–537
11. Hollway W. (1984). Gender difference, and the production of subjectivity. In Henriques J., Hollway W., Urwin C., Venn C., Walkerdine V.,(Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 227–263). London: Methuen
12. Hollway W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. London: Sage
13. Marecek J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50, 162–163
14. Marecek J. (1997). Feminist psychology at thirty-something. In Looser D., Kaplan E. A.,(Eds.), Generations: Academic feminists in dialogue (pp. 132–150). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
15. Marecek J. Fine M. Kidder L. (1997). Working between worlds: Qualitative research and social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 631–664
16. Potter J. (1996). Discourse analysis, and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. In Richardson J. T. E.,(Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods (pp. 125–140). Leicester, UK: BPS Books
17. Potter J. Wetherell M. (1987). Discourse analysis and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage
18. Scott J. W. (1988). Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press
19. Spelman E. V. (1988). Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon Press
20. Tiefer L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical, and feminist criticisms of “The Human Sexual Response Cycle” model. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 1–23
21. Weedon C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructural theory. Oxford: Blackwell
22. Weisstein N. (1993). Response and afterword: A call for a revitalized feminist psychology. Feminism and Psychology, 3, 239–245