A Siege Mentality at Lampeter? Let Ludwig in - He's a Friend

Archaeological Dialogues

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 37-43

  Bintliff, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992814391     PISSN: 13802038     EISSN: 14782294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1380203800002567     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson B., 1994: Exodus, Critical inquiry 20, 314–327.
2. Apel K.-O., 1971: Szientistik, Hermeneutik, Ideologiekritik. Entwurf einer Wissenschaftslehre in erkenntnisanthropologischer Sicht, in Apel K.-O., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, Frankfurt am Main, 7–44.
3. Arnold B., 1990: The past as propaganda: totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany, Antiquity 64 (244), 464–478.
4. Bahn P., 1998: Iceman returns to italy. Police escort Ötzi home, Archaeology May/June, 26.
5. Bernbeck R., and Pollock S., 1996: Ayodhya, archaeology, and identity, Current anthropology 37 (Supplement), 138–142.
6. Bintliff J.L., 1988: A review of contemporary perspectives on the ‘meaning’ of the past, in Bintliff J. (ed.), Extracting meaning from the past, Oxford (Oxbow Monograph 1), 2–36.
7. Bintliff J.L., 1991: Post-modernism, rhetoric and scholasticism at TAG: the current state of British archaeological theory, Antiquity 65, 274–278.
8. Bintliff J.L., 1993: Why Indiana Jones is smarter than the Post-Processualists, Norwegian archaeological review, 26, 91–100.
9. Bintliff J.L., 1995: ‘Whither archaeology?’ revisited, in Kuna M. and Venclova N. (eds), Whither archaeology? Papers in honour of Evzen Neustupny, Prague, 24–35.
10. Bintliff J.L., 1997: Catastrophe, chaos and complexity: the death, decay and rebirth of towns from Antiquity to today, Journal of European archaeology 5, 67–90.
11. Connor S., 1992: The ethics of discourse: Habermas, Lyotard and Rorty, in Connor S., Theory and cultural value, Oxford, 102–132.
12. Danforth L.M., 1995: The Macedonian conflict: ethnic nationalism in a transnational world, Princeton (NJ).
13. Habermas J., 1968: Erkenntnis und Interesse, in Habermas J., Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’, Frankfurt am Main, 146–168.
14. Hassan F., 1997: Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder's ‘reflexive excavation methodology’, Antiquity 71, 1020–1025.
15. Hodder I. (ed.), 1996: On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–5, London (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara monographs 22).
16. Kohl P., 1993: Limits to a post-processual archaeology (or, the dangers of a new scholasticism), in Yoffee N. and Sherratt A. (eds), Archaeological theory. Who sets the agenda? Cambridge, 13–19.
17. Kohl P., 1988: Review of academic freedom and apartheid: the story of the World Archaeological Congress, Academe 74 (4), 40–41.
18. Kohl P., and Fawcett C. (eds) 1995, Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge.
19. Kohl P., and Fawcett C., 1995: Archaeology in the service of the state. Theoretical considerations, in Kohl P. and Fawcett C. (eds), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge, 3–18.
20. Koselleck R., 1979: Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten, Frankfurt am Main.
21. Kus S., 1989: Time is on my side, paper presented at the Wenner-Gren Foundation symposium ‘Critical approaches in archaeology: material life, meaning, and power’ Cascais, Portugal, 17–25 March 1989 (unpublished paper).
22. Latour B., 1988: The pasteurization of France, Cambridge (MA).
23. Lowenthal D., 1985: The past is a foreign country, Cambridge.
24. Renfrew C., 1996: Prehistory and the identity of Europe or, Don't lets be beastly to the Hungarians, in Graves-Brown P., Jones S. and Gamble C. (eds), Cultural identity and archaeology. The construction of European communities, London, 125–137.
25. Shanks M., and Tilley C., 1987: Re-constructing archaeology. Theory and practice, London.