Why I wrote … Rights, Duties and the Body: Law and Ethics of the Maternal-Fetal Conflict

Clinical Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 164-169

  Scott, Rosamund ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992804114     PISSN: 14777509     EISSN: 1758101X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ce.2010.010028     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Re S (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) (1992) 4 All E.R. 671.
2. Re M.B., 8 Med. L.R. 217 (1997), discussed below.
3. Kennedy I. A woman and her unborn child., In: Treat Me Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, 364–84.
4. Dworkin R. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. London: Harper Collins, 1993.
5. Bonte v. Bonte, 616 A.2d 464 (N.H. 1992).
6. Drama in the womb: a matter of life and death winds up in court. Los Angeles Times, 25 December 1987, 5 A-5.
7. Scott R. Rights, Duties and the Body: Law and Ethics of the Maternal-Fetal Conflict. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002, 258.
8. P. Gewirtz, ‘Aeschylus’ law, Harvard L Rev 1988; 101 1043–55.
9. Re L [1997] 1 F.C.R. 609.
10. Rochdale (N.H.S.) Trust v. C [1997] 1 F.C.R. 274.
11. Re M.B., 8 Med. L.R. 217 [1997].
12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 120 L.Ed. 674 (1992).