Human Subjects Research by Business Students: Beyond the Red Tape

Business Communication Quarterly

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 9-22

  Jenson, Jill D ^a   Mackiewicz, jo ^a   Riley, Kathryn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional Review Board; research with human subjects

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992796953     PISSN: 10805699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/108056990306600202     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Association of University Professors [AAUP]. (2000). Protecting human beings: Institutional review boards and social science research Retrieved March 1, 2002, from www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/repirb.htm.
2. American Marketing Association. (2002). AMA code of ethics Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.MarketingPower.com.
3. Anderson, P.V. (1998). Simple gifts: Ethical issues in the conduct of person-based composition research College Composition and Communication, 49, 63-89.
4. Association for Investment Management and Research. (1999). Code of ethics and standards of professional conduct Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.aimr.com/standards/ethics/code/translations.html.
5. College of St. Scholastica Institutional Review Board. (2002). Exceptions and waivers Retrieved August 5, 2002, from www.css.edu/Committees/HSRC/waiver.html.
6. Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects. (2002). Application for review of training programs and classes requiring the use of human subjects in research Retrieved August 5, 2002, from www.osp.cornell.edu/compliance/UCHS/Class.doc
7. Council of American Survey Research Organizations. (2002). CASRO code of standards and ethics for survey research Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.casro.org/codeofstandards.cfm.
8. European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research. (2000 a). Conducting marketing and opinion research using the Internet Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.esomar.nl/guidelines/internet_guidelines.html
9. European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research. (2000 b). ICC/ESOMAR international code of marketing and social research practice Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.esomar.nl/code_1.html.
10. Frey, L.R., Botan, C.H., & Kreps, G.L. (2000). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11. Hubbard, R.W., & Ritchie, K.L. (1995). The human subjects review procedure: An exercise in critical thinking for undergraduate experimental psychology students Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 64-65.
12. Hubbartt, W.S. (1998). The new battle over workplace privacy New York: AMACOM/American Management Association.
13. Marketing Research Association. (2000). Use of the Internet for conducting opinion and marketing research Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.mra-net.org/docs/industry/internet_ethics_guidelines.cfm.
14. Marketing Research Association. (2001). Professional standards: Enforcement and filing a complaint Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.mra-net.org/docs/industry/enforcement.cfm.
15. Marketing Research Association. (2002a). The code of professional ethics and practices of the Marketing Research Association, Inc Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.mra-net.org/docs/industry/code_dcs.cfm.
16. Marketing Research Association. (2002b). Recommended best business practices Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.mra-net.org/docs/industry/best_business_practices_1.cfm.
17. North Dakota State University Sponsored Programs Administration. (2001). What activities require review? Retrieved July 16, 2002, from www.ndsu.edu/research/compliance/irb/activities.shtml.
18. Office of Human Subjects Research. (1991). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects, 45 CFR 46 Retrieved February 21, 2002, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/mpa/45cfr46.php3.
19. Shea, C. (September 2000). Don't talk to the humans: The crackdown on social science research Lingua Franca, 27-34.
20. Society for Human Resource Management. (2002 ). SHRM code of ethical and professional standards in human resource management Retrieved July 12, 2002, from www.shrm.org/ethics/default.asp?page=code-of-ethics.htm.
21. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Institutional Review Board. (2001). Part III: Review procedures Retrieved August 5, 2002, from www.irb.uiuc.edu/hbsec3.html.
22. University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. (1997). Protecting human subjects guide Retrieved June 24, 2002, from www.research.umn.edu/subjects/humans/guide/humans1.html.
23. Zikmund, W.G. (2000). Business research methods (6th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.