The Ontological Politics of Staying True to Complexity

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 475-480

  Landström, Catharina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992793068     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030631200030003007     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. The papers in the volume are as follows: John Law, ‘After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology’, 1–14
2. Bruno Latour, ‘On Recalling ANT’, 15–25
3. Steven D. Brown and Rose Capdevila, ‘Perpetuum Mobile: Substance, Force and the Sociology of Translation’, 26–50
4. Kevin Hetherington, ‘From Blindness to Blindness: Museums, Heterogeneity and the Subject’, 51–73
5. Annemarie Mol, ‘Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions’, 74–89
6. Nick Lee and Paul Stenner, ‘Who Pays? Can We Pay Them Back?’, 90–112
7. Anni Dugdale, ‘Materiality: Juggling Sameness and Difference’, 113–135
8. Helen Verran, ‘Staying True to the Laughter in Nigerian Classrooms’, 136–155
9. Marilyn Strathern, ‘What is Intellectual Property After?’, 156–180
10. Michel Callon, ‘Actor-Network Theory - The Market Test’, 181–195
11. Ingunn Moser and John Law, ‘Good Passages, Bad Passages’, 196–219
12. Emilie Gomart and Antoine Hennion, ‘A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users’, 220–247
13. Michel Callon and Bruno Latour, ‘Don't Throw the Baby Out with the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley’, in Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press, 1992), 343–368
14. Madeleine Akrich, ‘Beyond Social Construction of Technology: The Shaping of People and Things in the Innovation Process’, in Meinolf Dierkes and Ute Hoffman (eds), New Technologies at the Outset: Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1992), 173–190