The promise and peril of video cases: Reflections on their creation and use

Journal of Management Education

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 409-424

  Liedtka, Jeanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992792456     PISSN: 10525629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105256290102500405     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Brownell, J. (1994). Teaching listening: Some thoughts on behavioral approaches. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 58(4), 19-24.
2. Bunch, J. (1986). The effective utilization of video as a training technology. ASTD Training, 2, iv-v.
3. Christensen, C. R, Garvin, D., & Sweet, A. (1991). Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: HBS.
4. Gragg, C. I. (1954). Because wisdom can't be told. In M. P. McNair & A. Hersum (Eds.), The case method at the Harvard Business School. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Hunter, P. (1990). A designer's guide to scriptwriting: Video capabilities and limitations. Performance and Instruction, 29(3), 18-22.
6. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 171-195.
7. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. London: McGraw-Hill.
8. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
9. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York: Doubleday.
10. Smith, D. (1991). Video communication: Structuring content for maximum effectiveness. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11. Taylor, M. (1988). Planning for video: A guide to making effective training videotapes.New York: Nichols.