Reproductive medicine and the concept of ‘quality’

Clinical Ethics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 189-193

  Wahlberg, Ayo ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992785542     PISSN: 14777509     EISSN: 1758101X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ce.2008.008033     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Duster T. Backdoor to Eugenics. New York, NY: Routledge, 2003.
2. Habermas J. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
3. Franklin S, Roberts C. Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.
4. Thompson C. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
5. Kerr A, Shakespeare T. Genetic Politics: From Eugenics to Genome. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press, 2002.
6. Rapp R. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: the Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York, NY: Routledge, 1999.
7. Duster T, Beeson D. Pathways and Barriers to Genetic Testing and Screening: Molecular Genetics Meets the ‘High Risk ‘Family. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, 1997.
8. Human Genetics Commission. Making Babies: Reproductive Decisions and Genetic Technologies. London: Human Genetics Commission, 2006.
9. Wahlberg A. Measuring progress – calculating the life of nations. Distinktion – Scand J Soc Theor 2007; 14: 65–82.
10. HFEA. List of Conditions Licensed by the HFEA Up To Date from December 2007. See http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/PGD_list_1.pdf (last checked 2 May 2008).
11. Williams C, Ehricha K, Farsides B, Scott R. Facilitating choice, framing choice: staff views on widening the scope of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the UK. Soc Sci Med 2007; 65: 1094–50.
12. Reuter S. ‘The politics of ‘wrongful life’ itself: discursive (mal) practices and Tay-Sachs disease. Econ Soc 2007; 36: 236–62.
13. Franklin S. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropol T 2003; 3: 65–85.
14. Gardner D. Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer – a review. Placenta 2003; 24 (Suppl. 2):S5–S12.
15. Coticchio G, Sereni E, Serrao L, Mazzone S, Iadarola I, Borini A. What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality? Ann NY Acad Sci 2004; 1034: 132–44.
16. Franklin S. Embryonic economies the double reproductive value of stem cells. Bio Societies 2006; 1: 71–90.
17. Godsen R. Designer Babies: the Brave New World of Reproductive Technology. London: Victor Gollancz, 1999.
18. Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York, NY: D Appleton and Co., 1871.
19. Koch L, Svendsen MN. Providing solutions–defining problems: the imperative of disease prevention in genetic counselling. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 823–32.
20. Wertz D, Fletcher J. Genetics and Ethics in Global Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.