The second language segment revisited

Second Language Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 163-167

  Archibald, John ^a   Young Scholten, Martha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992779441     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0267658303sr218ed     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brannen, K. 2002: The role of perception in differential substitution. Canadian Journal of L inguistics 47, 1-46.
2. Brannen, K. 1997: A cquisition of segmental structure: consequences for speech perception and second language acquisition. U npublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
3. Brannen, K. 1993: The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. McGill Working Papers in L inguistics 9, 180-210.
4. Curtin, S., Goad, H. and Pater, J. 1998: Phonological transfer and levels of representation: the perceptual acquisition of Thai voice and aspiration by English and French speakers. Second language research 14, 389-405.
5. Eckman, F. 1977: Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. L anguage L earning 27, 315-330.
6. Eckman, F. 1981: on predicting phonological difficulty in second language acquisition. Studies in Second L anguage A cquisition 4, 18-30.
7. Flege, J. E. 1987: The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15, 47-65.
8. Flege, J. E. 1995:Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems. In Strange, W., editor, Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, 233-277.
9. Hancin-Bhatt, B. 1994a: Phonological transfer in second language perception and production. U npublished doctoral dissertation. U niversity of Illinois.
10. Hancin-Bhatt, B. 1994b: Segment transfer: a consequence of a dynamic system. Second L anguage Research 10, 241-269.
11. James, A. 1988: The acquisition of second language phonology. Tübingen: G unter Narr.
12. Kager, R. 1999: Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge U niversity Press.
13. Lado, R. 1957: L inguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. A nn A rbor, MI: U niversity of Michigan Press.
14. Teasdale, A. 1997: O n the differential substitution of English []: a phonetic approach. Calgary Working Papers in L inguistics 19.
15. Trubetzkoy, N. 1958: G rundzüge der Phonologie (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7). Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht. Published 1958. (Original work published in 1939.)
16. Weinberger, S.H. 1994: Theoretical foundations of second language phonology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
17. Weinberger, S. H. 1997: Minimal segments in second language phonology. In James, A. and Leather, J., editors, Second language speech: structure and process. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 263-312.
18. Weinreich, U. 1957: O n the description of phonic interference. Word 13, 1-11.