Commentary: Politics, Context, and Integrity

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 269-273

  Thomas, Charles L ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992769444     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109821400002100218     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluators. (1995). Guiding principles for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators. New directions for program evaluation, 66 (pp. 19-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Chelimsky, E. (1987). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8 (1), 5-21.
3. House, E. (1980). Evaluating with validity. London: Sage Publications.
4. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Mathison, S. (1999). Rights, responsibilities, and duties: A comparison of ethics for internal and external evaluators. In J. L. Fitzpatrick & M. Morris (Eds.), Current and emerging ethical challenges in evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 82 (pp. 25-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Newman, D. L., & Brown, R. D. (1996). Applied ethics for program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.