Nonthermal, Nontumescent Endovenous Treatment of Varicose Veins

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue , 2016, Pages 231-235

  Tekin, Ali İhsan ^a   Tuncer, Osman Nuri ^b   Memetoğlu, Mehmet Erdem ^c   Arslan, Ümit ^d   Öztekin, Ahmet ^e   Yağmur, Bayram ^a   Biçer, Mahmut ^a   Özmen, Rıfat ^a  

^a Kayseri Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b ERZINCAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Dr Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^d Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^e Sanliurfa Mehmet Akif Inan Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYANOACRYLATE; CYANOACRYLATE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; COMPRESSION BANDAGE; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECCHYMOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PHLEBITIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THROMBOPHLEBITIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; VARICOSIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLIZATION; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DUPLEX DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FIBROSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MINIATURIZATION; PROCEDURES; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURKEY; VARICOSE VEINS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; COMPRESSION BANDAGES; CYANOACRYLATES; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIATURIZATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TURKEY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX; VARICOSE VEINS; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES;

EID: 84992736575     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: 16155947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 1 Allegra, C., Antignani, P.L., Bergan, J.J., et al. The “C” of CEAP: suggested definitions and refinements: an International Union of Phlebology conference of experts. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003), 129–131.
2. 2 Robertson, L., Evans, C., Fowkes, F.G., Epidemiology of chronic venous disease. Phlebology 23 (2008), 103–111.
3. 3 Rass, K., Frings, N., Glowacki, P., et al. Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study). Arch Dermatol 148 (2012), 49–58.
4. 4 Rasmussen, L.H., Lawaetz, M., Bjoern, L., et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 98 (2011), 1079–1087.
5. 5 Marsden, G., Perry, M., Kelley, K., et al., Guideline Development Group. Diagnosis and management of varicose veins in the legs: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ, 347, 2013, f4279.
6. 6 Kerver, A.L., van der Ham, A.C., Theeuwes, H.P., et al. The surgical anatomy of the small saphenous vein and adjacent nerves in relation to endovenous thermal ablation. J Vasc Surg 56 (2012), 181–188.
7. 7 Bakker, N.A., Schieven, L.W., Bruins, R.M., et al. Compression stockings after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 46 (2013), 588–592.
8. 8 McHugh, S.M., Leahy, A.L., What next after thermal ablation for varicose veins: non-thermal ablation?. Surgeon 12 (2014), 237–238.
9. 9 Rasmussen, L.H., Bjoern, L., Lawaetz, M., et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: clinical outcome and recurrence after 2 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39 (2010), 630–635.
10. 10 Proebstle, T.M., Alm, J., Gockeritz, O., et al. Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg 54 (2011), 146–152.
11. 11 Shadid, N., Ceulen, R., Nelemans, P., et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for the incompetent great saphenous vein. Br J Surg 99 (2012), 1062–1070.
12. 12 Lurie, F., Commentary: Endovenous mechanochemical ablation: how much improvement is good enough?. J Endovasc Ther 18 (2011), 335–337.
13. 13 Almeida, J.I., Javier, J.J., Mackay, E.G., et al. Two-year follow-up of first human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology 30 (2015), 397–404.
14. 14 Kailasnath, P., Chaloupka, J.C., Quantitative assessment of polymerization-binding mechanics of cyanoacrylates: model development and validation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23 (2002), 772–778.
15. 15 Min, R.J., Almeida, J.I., McLean, D.J., et al. Novel vein closure procedure using a proprietary cyanoacrylate adhesive: 30-day swine model results. Phlebology 27 (2012), 398–403.
16. 16 Almeida, J.I., Min, R.J., Raabe, R., et al. Cyanoacrylate adhesive for the closure of truncal veins: 60-day swine model results. Vasc Endovascular Surg 45 (2011), 631–635.
17. 17 Almeida, J.I., Javier, J.J., Mackay, E.G., et al. Cyanoacrylate glue great saphenous vein ablation: preliminary 180-day follow-up of a first-in-man feasibility study of a no-compression-no-local-anesthesia technique. J Vasc Surg, 55, 2012, 297.
18. 18 Almeida, J.I., Javier, J.J., Mackay, E.G., et al. First human use of cyanoacrylate adhesive for treatment of saphenous vein incompetence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 1 (2013), 174–180.
19. 19 Proebstle, T.M., Alm, J., Dimitri, S., et al. The European multicenter cohort study on cyanoacrylate embolization of refluxing great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 3 (2015), 2–7.
20. 20 Morrison, N., Gibson, K., McEnroe, S., et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 985–994.