Mapping of fire severity and comparison of severity indices across vegetation types in gibraltar range National Park, Australia

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 37, Issue , 2008, Pages 1477-1482

  Kumar, Lalit ^a   Clarke, Peter ^a   Muñoz, Carlos ^a   Knox, Kirsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Burn severity; Fire severity; NBR; NDVI; Spectral indices

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PLANTS (BOTANY); REFLECTION; REMOTE SENSING; VEGETATION;

BIOPHYSICAL FACTORS; BURN SEVERITY; ENHANCED THEMATIC MAPPER IMAGES; FIRE SEVERITY; GENERAL LINEAR MODELS; NDVI; SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS; SPECTRAL INDICES;

FIRES;

EID: 84992466328     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Cary, G. J. 2002. Importance of Changing Climate for Fire Regimes in Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent. In: Flammable Australia. Ed. JEW Ross A. Bradstock, Malcolm A. Gill p. 454. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
3. Chander, G., Markham, B. 2003. Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, pp. 2674-2677.
4. Cocke, A. E, Fulé, P. Z., Crouse, J. E. 2005. Comparison of burn severity assessment using Differenced Normalized Burn Ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 14, pp. 189-198.
5. De Santis, A., Chuvieco, E. 2007. Burn severity estimation from remotely sensed data: Performance of simulation versus empirical models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108, pp. 422-435.
6. Díaz-Delgado, R., Lloret, F., Pons, X. 2003. Influence of fire severity on plant regeneration by means of remote sensing imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 1751-1763.
7. Epting, J., Verbyla, D., Sorbel, B. 2005. Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96, pp. 328-339.
8. Escuin, S., Navarro, R., Fernández, P. 2008. Fire severity by using NBR Normalized Burn Ratio and NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index derived from Landsat TM/ETM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, pp. 1053-1073.
9. Hammill, K. A., Bradstock, R. A. 2006. Remote sensing of fire severity in the Blue Mountains: influence of vegetation type and inferring fire intensity. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 15, pp. 213-226.
10. Hennessy, K., Lucas, C., Nicholls, N., Bathols, J., Suppiah, R., Ricketts, J. 2005. Climate Change Impacts on Fire-weather in South-East Australia. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation CSIRO. Australia.
11. Iverson, L. R., and Graham., R. L., Cook, E. A. 1989. Applications of satellite remote sensing to forested ecosystems. Landscape Ecology, 3, pp. 131-143.
12. Jensen, J. R. 2000. Remote Sensing of the Environment. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
13. Key, C. H., Benson, N. C. 2002. Measuring and Remote sensing of burn severity. In Second U.S. Geological Survey Wildland Fire Workshop. p. 109. U.S. Geological Survey: Los Alamos, New Mexico.
14. Key, C. H., Benson, N. C. 2006. Landscape assessment. Sampling and analysis methods. In FIREMON Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System. Ed. UF Service. USDA Forest Service. RMRS-GTR-164CD: Fort Collins.
15. Lentile, L. B., and Holden., Z. A., Smith, A. M. S., Falkowsky, M. J., and Hudak., A. T., Morgan, P., Lewis, S. A., and Gessler., P. E., Benson, N. C. 2006. Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 15, pp. 319-345.
16. Lozano, F. J., Suárez-Seoane, S., de Luis, E. 2007. Assessment of several spectral indices derived from multi-temporal Landsat data for fire occurrence probability modelling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 107, pp. 533-544.
17. NASA. 2007. Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook. http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/handbook.html (accessed February 2007).
18. Rogan, J., Yool, S. R. 2001. Mapping fire-induced vegetation depletion in the Peloncillo Mountains, Arizona and New Mexico. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, pp. 3101-3121.
19. Tucker, C. J. 1980. Remote sensing of leaf water content in the near infrared. Remote Sensing of Environment, 10, pp. 23-32.
20. van Wagtendonk, J. W., Root, R. R., Key, C. H. 2004. Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92, pp. 397-408.
21. Wimberly, M. C., Reilly, M. J. 2007. Assessment of fire severity and species diversity in the southern Appalachians using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108, pp. 189-197.