Embryonic aneuploidy does not differ among genetic ancestry according to continental origin as determined by ancestry informative markers

Human Reproduction

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 2391-2395

  Franasiak, Jason M ^a,b   Olcha, Meir ^a   Shastri, Shefali ^b   Molinaro, Thomas A ^b   Congdon, Haley ^b   Treff, Nathan R ^b   Scott, Richard T ^a,b  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

ancestry informative markers; chromosome screening; embryonic aneuploidy; ethnicity; genetic ancestry

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; AFRICAN; ALGORITHM; ANCESTRY GROUP; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CENTRAL ASIAN; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; EAST ASIAN; EMBRYO; EUROPEAN; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOUTH ASIAN; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84992395308     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew195     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Baker VL, Luke B, Brown MB, Alvero R, Frattarelli JL, Usadi R, Grainger DA, Armstrong AY. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting probability of pregnancy and live birth with in vitro fertilization: An analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1410-1416.
2. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015;104:1503-1512.
3. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003;164:1567-1587.
4. Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: A review of 15, 169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril 2014;101:656-663. e1.
5. Hitlin S, Scott Brown J, Elder GH. Racial self-categorization in adolescence: multiracial development and social pathways. Child Dev 2006;77:1298-1308.
6. Humphries LA, Chang O, Humm K, Sakkas D, Hacker MR. Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:212. e1-212. e17.
7. Kosoy R, Nassir R, Tian C, White PA, Butler LM, Silva G, Kittles R, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Gregersen PK, Belmont JW et al. Ancestry informative marker sets for determining continental origin and admixture proportions in common populations in America. Hum Mutat 2009;30:69-78.
8. McQueen DB, Schufreider A, Lee SM, Feinberg EC, Uhler ML. Racial disparities in in vitro fertilization outcomes. Fertil Steril 2015;104:398-402. e1.
9. Mersha TB, Abebe T. Self-reported race/ethnicity in the age of genomic research: its potential impact on understanding health disparities. Hum Genomics 2015;9:1.
10. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000;155:945-959.
11. Seifer DB, Frazier LM, Grainger DA. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1701-1710.
12. Sucheston LE, Bensen JT, Xu Z, Singh PK, Preus L, Mohler JL, Su LJ, Fontham ETH, Ruiz B, Smith GJ et al. Genetic ancestry, self-reported race and ethnicity in African Americans and European Americans in the PCaP cohort. PLoS One 2012;7:e30950.