Carrots, not sticks: Rethinking enforcement of intellectual property rights for 3d-printed manufacturing

3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 44-51

  Kurman, Melba ^a  

^a Triple Helix Innovation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL STORAGE; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS MODEL INNOVATION; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; IP PROTECTION; LOCALIZED EFFECTS; MEDIA INDUSTRY; PROTECTED OBJECT;

3D PRINTERS;

EID: 84992389905     PISSN: 23297662     EISSN: 23297670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2014.0002     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Wohlers T. Wohlers report: Additive manufacturing and 3d printing state of the industry. Wohlers Associates, Fort Collins, CO, 2012.
2. Sissons A and Thompson S. Why Great Britain needs a policy framework for 3D printing. [Whitepaper] Big Innovation Centre, October 2012.
3. "The third Industrial Revolution: The digitisation of manufacturing will transform the way goods are made-and change the politics of jobs too. "The Economist , April 21, 2012.
4. Michael Weinberg. It will be awesome if they dont screw it up. [Whitepaper] Public knowledge, November 2010.
5. Doherty D. Patent law and 3D printing. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 2012; 26.
6. Brean DH. Asserting patents to combat infringement via 3D printing: Its no use.Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 2013;23: 772.
7. Simon M. When Copyright Can Kill: How 3D Printers Are Breaking the Barriers Between IntellectualProperty and the Physical World. Pace. I.P. Sports & Ent. Law Forum 2013; available at http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pipself/vol3/iss1/4
8. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 102(a) (1990). Available at www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#102
9. Kneissl W. 3D printing materials 2014-2025: Status, opportunities, market forecasts. Market research report available from IDTechEx, 2013.
10. Hughes M. LEGO background: Facts about LEGO. Available at www. factmonster.com/enter tainment/toys/lego-background.html
11. On the road: U.S. automotive parts industry annual assessment. [Report] Office of Transportation and Machinery, U.S. Department of Commerce. 2011.
12. Vogel B. Casting 3D printings coming IP litigation: Usual suspect and dark horses. Bloomberg Law Online, available at http://about.bloomberglaw.com/practitioner-contributions/casting-3d-printings-coming-ip-litigation-usual-suspects-and-dark-horses/
13. Simon M. When copyright can kill: How 3D printers are breaking the barriers between "intellectual "property and the physical world. Pace. I.P. Sports & Ent. Law Forum 2013. Available at http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pipself/vol3/iss1/4
14. Weinberg W. Whats the deal with copyright and 3D printing. [Whitepaper] Public knowledge, January 2013.
15. Urban JM and Quilter L. Symposium review. Efficient process or chilling effects-takedown notices under section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 2006; 621.
16. Carrier M. Copyright and innovation: the untold story. Wisconsin Law Review 2012; 891.
17. Engstrom NF. 3D printing and product liability: Identifying the obstacles. [Essay] University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online 2013. Available at www.pennlawreview.com/essays/10-2013/Engstrom.pdf
18. Regalado A. Nathan Myhrvolds cunning plan to prevent 3-D printer piracy. MIT Technology Review Online, October 11, 2012. Available at www.technologyreview.com/view/429566/nathan-myhrvolds-cunning-plan-to-prevent-3-d-printer-piracy/