Usage statistics for electronic journals: An analysis of local and vendor counts

Collection Management

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 3-22

  Stemper, James A ^a   Jaguszewski, Janice M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Click through technology; Electronic journals; Licensing; Usage statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992355296     PISSN: 01462679     EISSN: 15452549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J105v28n04_02     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Baker, Gayle, and Singer, Ross. 2000. Networked Resource Use Data for Collection Management. Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Library Association. July2000, Chicago, Ill. pp.7 http://www.lib.utk.edu/∼elecserv/data/poster.pdf (cited 1 August 2003)
2. December 2002. Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources COUNTER Code of Practice December, http://www.projectCounter.org (cited 1 August 2003)
3. Davis, Philip M., 2002. Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage:Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63(6):484–97.
4. Duy, Joanna, and Vaughan, Liwen. 2003. Usage Data for Electronic Resources:A Comparison Between Locally Collected and Vendor-Provided Statistics. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(1):16–22.
5. International Coalition of Library Consortia. December 2001. Guidelines for Statistical Measures of Usage of Web-Based Information Resources December, http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/2001webstats.htm (cited 1 August 2003)
6. Kohl, David. 2002. Consortial Licensing vs. Tradition:Breaking Up is Hard to Do. Presentation at the 18th International Learned Journals Seminar. April2002, London, England. pp.26 http://www.alpsp.org/seminars/previous/koh-1120402.ppt (cited 15 September 2003)
7. Luther, Judy. 2000. White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics, 32Washington, DC:Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub94/pub94.pdf (cited 1 August 2003)
8. MacAnova. A Program for Statistical Analysis and Matrix Algebra Version 4.12, Minneapolis, Minn.:University of Minnesota School of Statistics. http://www.stat.umn.edu/macanova/(cited 1 August 2003)
9. Montgomery, Carol H., and King, Donald W., 2002. Comparing Library and User Related Costs of Print and Electronic Journal Collections. D-Lib Magazine, 8(10) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html (cited 1 August 2003)
10. OhioLINK Library Advisory Committee. 2001. D-Lib Magazine, 7(4) To the Editor. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/04letters.html#SANVILLE (cited 1 August 2003)
11. Porter, George S., and Sponsler, Ed. Online Journals:Utility of ToCs vs. Fulltext. Crossing the Divide:Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference of the Association of College & Research Libraries. Chicago:The Association.
12. Shim, Wonsik J., McClure, Charles R., Fraser, Bruce T., Bertot, John C., Dagli, Arif, and Leahy, Emily H., October 2001. Measures and Statistics for Research Library Networked Services:Procedures and Issues:ARL E-Metrics Phase II Report October, 101 http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/phasetwo.pdf (cited 1 August 2003)
13. Trueswell, Richard L., 1969. Some Behavioral Patterns of Library Users:The 80/20 Rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43 January:458–61.