Phage vB_BsuP-Goe1: The smallest identified lytic phage of Bacillus subtilis

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 363, Issue 19, 2016, Pages

  Willms, Inka Marie ^a   Hertel, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bacillus subtilis; Goe1; Phi29likevirus; Picovirinae; Podoviridae; vB_BsuP Goe1

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS; BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIOPHAGE; BACTERIOPHAGE VB BSUP GOE1; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HOST RANGE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA GENE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; BACILLUS PHAGE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; OPEN READING FRAME; PHYLOGENY; PODOVIRIDAE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VIROLOGY; VIRUS GENOME; VIRUS REPLICATION;

VIRAL PROTEIN; VIRUS DNA;

BACILLUS PHAGES; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; DNA, VIRAL; GENOME, VIRAL; GENOMICS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; OPEN READING FRAMES; PHYLOGENY; PODOVIRIDAE; VIRAL PROTEINS; VIRUS REPLICATION;

EID: 84992183864     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: 15746968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw208     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-10.
2. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012;19:455-77.
3. Belda E, Sekowska A, Le Fèvre F et al. An updated metabolic viewof the Bacillus subtilis 168 genome. Microbiology 2013;159: 757-70.
4. Breitbart M, Rohwer F. Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus? Trends Microbiol 2005;13:278-84.
5. Castilla-Llorente V, Salas M, Meijer WJJ. Different responses to Spo0A-mediated suppression of the related Bacillus subtilis phages Nf and phi29. Environ Microbiol 2009;11:1137-49.
6. Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growthpromoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1007-14.
7. Crucitti P, Abril AM, Salas M. Bacteriophage phi 29 early protein p17. Self-association and hetero-association with the viral histone-like protein p6. J Biol Chem 2003;278:4906-11.
8. Crucitti P, Lázaro JM, V Beneš et al. Bacteriophage φ29 early protein p17 is conditionally required for the first rounds of viral DNA replication. Gene 1998;223:135-42.
9. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:1792-7.
10. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783.
11. Hemphill HE, Whiteley HR. Bacteriophages of Bacillus subtilis. Bacteriol Rev 1975;39:257-315.
12. Hertel R, Pintor Rodríguez D, Hollensteiner J et al. Genomebased identification of active prophage regions by next generation sequencing in Bacillus licheniformis DSM13. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120759.
13. Horcajadas JA, Meijer WJ, Rojo F et al. Analysis of early promoters of the Bacillus bacteriophage GA-1. J Bacteriol 2001;183: 6965-70.
14. ICTV. Virus Taxonomy: 2014 Release. 2014. http://www.ictvonline.org/virustaxonomy.asp (13 September 2016, date last accessed).
15. Kropinski AM, Prangishvili D, Lavigne R. Position paper: the creation of a rational scheme for the nomenclature of viruses of Bacteria and Archaea. Environ Microbiol 2009;11: 2775-7.
16. Krueger F. Trim Galore. 2013. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/(13 September 2016, date last accessed).
17. Li H. seqtk. 2012. https://github.com/lh3/seqtk (13 September 2016, date last accessed).
18. Logan NA, De Vos P. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology-Volume 3: The Firmicutes. New York: Springer, 2009.
19. Mahadevan P, King JF, Seto D. CGUG: in silico proteome and genome parsing tool for the determination of "core" and unique genes in the analysis of genomes up to ca. 1.9 Mb. BMC Res Notes 2009;2:168.
20. Meijer WJ, Horcajadas JA, Salas M. Phi29 family of phages. Microbiol Mol Biol R 2001;65:261-87, second page, table of contents.
21. Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1972.
22. Nishito Y, Osana Y, Hachiya T et al. Whole genome assembly of a natto production strain Bacillus subtilis natto from very short read data. BMC Genomics 2010;11:243.
23. Paces V, Vlcek C, Urbánek P et al. Nucleotide sequence of the right early region of Bacillus subtilis phage PZA completes the 19366-bp sequence of PZA genome. Comparison with the homologous sequence of phage phi 29. Gene 1986;44: 115-20.
24. Pečenková T, Beneš V, Pačes J et al. Bacteriophage B103: complete DNA sequence of its genome and relationship to other Bacillus phages. Gene 1997;199:157-63.
25. Pečenková T, Pačes V. Molecular phylogeny of φ29-like phages and their evolutionary relatedness to other protein-primed replicating phages and other phages hosted by gram-positive bacteria. J Mol Evol 1999;48:197-208.
26. Rachinger M, Volland S, Meinhardt F et al. First insights into the completely annotated genome sequence of Bacillus licheniformis strain 9945A. Genome Announc 2013;1, DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00525-13.
27. Rey MW, Ramaiya P, Nelson BA et al. Complete genome sequence of the industrial bacterium Bacillus licheniformis and comparisons with closely related Bacillus species. Genome Biol 2004;5:R77.
28. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4: 406-25.
29. Salmond GPC, Fineran PC. A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015;13:777-86.
30. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2068-9.
31. Shimizu N, Miura K, Aoki H. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage. II. Isolation and morphology of phage Nf and properties of its DNA. J Biochem 1970;68:277-86.
32. Spizizen J. Transformation of biochemically deficient strains of Bacillus subtilis by deoxyribonucleate. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1958;44:1072-8.
33. SullivanMJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1009-10.
34. Takagi J, Hirokawa H, Saito H. Characteristics of transfection of Bacillus subtilis phages M2 and Nf. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1978;24:135-7.
35. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D et al. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30:2725-9.
36. Tao Y, Olson NH, Xu W et al. Assembly of a tailed bacterial virus and its genome release studied in three dimensions. Cell 1998;95:431-7.
37. Tirumalai MR, Fox GE. An ICEBs1-like element may be associated with the extreme radiation and desiccation resistance of Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032 spores. Extremophiles 2013;17: 767-74.
38. Veith B, Herzberg C, Steckel S et al. The complete genome sequence of Bacillus licheniformis DSM13, an organism with great industrial potential. J Mol Microb Biotech 2004;7:204-11.
39. Villegas AP, Lingohr EJ, Ceyssens P-J et al. Bacillus Phage phi29, Complete Genome. 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/194186868 (13 September 2016, date last accessed).
40. Weigmann. Bacillus licheniformis DSM12369. 1898, https://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/details/culture/DSM-12369.html.
41. Westers H, Dorenbos R, van Dijl JM et al. Genome engineering reveals large dispensable regions in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Biol Evol 2003;20:2076-90.
42. Zeigler DR, Pr Ágai Z, Rodriguez S et al. The origins of 168, W23, and other Bacillus subtilis legacy strains. J Bacteriol 2008;190:6983-95.
43. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ (eds). Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York: Academic Press Inc., 1965, 97-166.