Correction: Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2016) 68(6) (626–635)(S0735109716333538)(10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.049));Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 626-635

  McNamara, Robert L ^a   Kennedy, Kevin F ^b   Cohen, David J ^b   Diercks, Deborah B ^c   Moscucci, Mauro ^d,e   Ramee, Stephen ^f   Wang, Tracy Y ^g   Connolly, Traci ^h   Spertus, John A ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SAINT LUKE S MID AMERICA HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^f OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiac arrest; cardiogenic shock; creatinine clearance; model; risk prediction; systolic blood pressure

Indexed keywords

TROPONIN;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE CLEARANCE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART FAILURE; HEART RATE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMAN; KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION; LOW RISK POPULATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY RATE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEART INFARCTION; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

AGED; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROGNOSIS; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84992151923     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. 1 Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E.J., Go, A.S., et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133 (2016), e38–e360.
2. 2 Ford, E.S., Ajani, U.A., Croft, J.B., et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease 1980–2000. N Engl J Med 356 (2007), 2388–2398.
3. 3 de Vreede, J.J., Gorgels, A.P., Verstraaten, G.M., et al. Did prognosis after acute myocardial infarction change during the past 30 years? A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 18 (1991), 698–706.
4. 4 Peterson, E.D., Shah, B.R., Parsons, L., et al. Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. Am Heart J 156 (2008), 1045–1055.
5. ®. Am Heart J 5 (2014), 766–775.
6. 6 Normand, S.T., Glickman, M.E., Sharma, R.G., McNeil, B.J., Using admission characteristics to predict short-term mortality from myocardial infarction in elderly patients. Results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 275 (1996), 1322–1328.
7. 7 Krumholz, H.M., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Radfod, M.J., Chen, Y.T., Marciniak, T.A., Comparing AMI mortality among hospitals in patients 65 years of age and older: evaluating methods of risk adjustment. Circulation 99 (1999), 2986–2992.
8. 8 Antman, E.M., Cohen, M., Bernink, P.J., et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision-making. JAMA 284 (2000), 835–842.
9. 9 Dorsch, M., Lawrance, R.A., Sapsford, R.J., et al. A simple benchmark for evaluating quality of care of patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart 86 (2001), 150–154.
10. 10 Granger, C.B., Goldberg, R.J., Dabbous, O.H., et al., for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Investigators. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003), 2345–2353.
11. 11 Wells, B., Gentry, M., Ruiz-Arango, A., Dias, J., Landolfoc, K., Relation between body mass index and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006), 474–477.
12. 12 Tabak, Y.P., Johannes, R.S., Silber, J.H., Using automated clinical data for risk adjustment: development and validation of six disease-specific mortality predictive models for pay-for-performance. Med Care 45 (2007), 789–805.
13. 13 Johnston, T.C., Coory, M.D., Scott, I., Duckett, S., Should we add clinical variables to administrative data? The case of risk-adjusted case fatality rates after admission for acute myocardial infarction. Med Care 45 (2007), 1180–1185.
14. ®–Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)™ acute myocardial infarction mortality model and risk score. Am Heart J 161 (2011), 113–122.
15. 15 Alahmar, A.E., Nelson, C.P., Snell, K.I., et al. Resuscitated cardiac arrest and prognosis following myocardial infarction. Heart 100 (2014), 1125–1132.
16. 16 Peterson, E.D., Roe, M.T., Rumsfeld, J.S., et al. A call to ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network): a national effort to promote timely clinical feedback and support continuous quality improvement for acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2 (2009), 491–499.
17. 17 Krone, R.J., Shaw, R.E., Klein, L.W., et al. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current “stent era” of coronary interventions (from the ACC-National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol 92 (2003), 389–394.
18. 18 Messenger, J.C., Ho, K.K., Young, C.H., et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief. The NCDR data quality program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 1484–1488.
19. 19 Cockcroft, D.W., Gault, M.H., Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16 (1976), 31–41.
20. 20 Roe, M.T., Peterson, E.D., Li, Y., et al. Relationship between risk stratification by cardiac troponin level and adherence to guidelines for non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Arch Intern Med 165 (2005), 1870–1876.
21. 21 Harrell, F.E. Jr., Regression Modeling Strategies With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. 2001, Springer, New York, 99–100.
22. 22 Steyerberg, E.W., Borsboom, G.J., van Houwelingen, H.C., Eijkemans, M.J., Habbema, J.D., Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med 23 (2004), 2567–2586.
23. 23 Krumholz, H.M., Wang, Y., Mattera, J.A., et al. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 113 (2006), 1683–1692.
24. 24 Piccini, J.P., Berger, J.S., Brown, D.L., Early sustained ventricular arrhythmias complicating acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 121 (2008), 797–804.
25. 25 de Jong, J.S.S.G., Marsman, R.F., Henriques, J.P.S., et al. Prognosis among survivors of primary ventricular fibrillation in the percutaneous coronary intervention era. Am Heart J 158 (2009), 467–472.
26. 26 Mehta, R.H., Starr, A.Z., Lopes, R.D., et al. Incidence of and outcomes associated with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 301 (2009), 1779–1789.
27. 27 Brennan, J.M., Curtis, J.P., Dai, D., et al. on behalf of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Enhanced mortality risk prediction with a focus on high risk percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 1,208,137 procedures in the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 6 (2013), 790–799.
28. 28 Moscucci, M., Eagle, K.A., Share, D., et al. Public reporting and case selection for percutaneous coronary interventions: an analysis from two large multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention databases. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005), 1759–1765.
29. 29 Resnick, F.R., Welt, F.G.P., The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009), 825–830.
30. 30 Hannah, E.L., The public reporting risk of performing high-risk procedures: Perception or reality. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 (2015), 17–18.
31. 31 Morrow, D.A., Antman, E.M., Charlesworth, A., et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation. Circulation 102 (2000), 2031–2037.
32. 32 Califf, R.M., Pieper, K.S., Lee, K.L., et al. Prediction of 1-year survival after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries Trial. Circulation 101 (2000), 2231–2238.
33. 33 Lichtman, J.H., Spertus, J.A., Reid, K.J., et al. Acute noncardiac conditions and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 116 (2007), 1925–1930.