A comparison of event models for naive bayes anti-spam E-mail filtering

10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 307-314

  Schneider, Karl Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); CLASSIFIERS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TEXT PROCESSING;

ANTI-SPAM; BERNOULLI MODEL; EVENT MODEL; FEATURE RANKING; FEATURES SELECTION; MULTINOMIAL MODEL; MULTINOMIALS; NAIVE BAYES; NAIVE BAYES TEXT CLASSIFIER; RANKING FUNCTIONS;

ELECTRONIC MAIL;

EID: 84991870594     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ion Androutsopoulos, John Koutsias, Konstantinos V. Chandrinos, and Constantine D. Spyropoulos. 2000a. An experimental comparison of Naive Bayesian and keyword-based anti-spam filtering with personal e-mail messages. In N. J. Belkin, P. Inwersen, and M.-K. Leong, editors, Proc. 23rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2000), pages 160-167, Athens, Greece.
2. Ion Androutsopoulos, Georgios Paliouras, Vangelis Karkaletsis, Georgios Sakkis, Constantine D. Spyropoulos, and Panagiotis Stamatopoulos. 2000b. Learning to filter spam e-mail: A comparison of a Naive Bayesian and a memory-based approach. In H. Zaragoza, P. Gallinari, and M. Rajman, editors, Proc. Workshop on Machine Learning and Textual Infbrmation Access, 4th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD 2000), pages 1-13, Lyon, France.
3. Xavier Carreras and Lillis Marquez. 2001. Boosting trees for anti-spam email filtering. In Proc. International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-01), Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria.
4. William W. Cohen. 1996. Learning rules that classify e-mail. In Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning in Information Access, pages 18-25, Stanford, CA. AAAI Press.
5. Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of InfOrmation Theory. John Wiley, New York.
6. Pedro Domingos and Michael Pazzani. 1997. On the optimality of the simple bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning, 29:103-130.
7. Harris Drucker, Donghui Wu, and Vladimir N. Vapnik. 1999. Support vector machines for spam categorization. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, l0(5):1048-1054.
8. David D. Lewis. 1998. Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In Proc. 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML98), volume 1398 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 4-15, Heidelberg. Springer.
9. Andrew McCallum and Kamal Nigam. 1998. A comparison of event models for Naive Bayes text classification. In Proc. AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, pages 41-48. AAAI Press.
10. Dunja Mladeni6 and Marko Grobelnik. 1999. Feature selection for unbalanced class distribution and Naive Bayes. In I. Bratko and S. Dzeroski, editors, Proc. 16th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99), pages 258-267, San Francisco, CA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
11. Jason D. M. Rennie. 2000. ifile: An application of machine learning to e-mail filtering. In Proc. KDD-2000 Workshop on Text Mining, Boston, MA.
12. Mehran Sahami, Susan Dumais, David Heckerman, and Eric Horvitz. 1998. A bayesian approach to filtering junk e-mail. In Learning for Text Categorization: Papers from the AAAI Workshop, pages 55-62, Madison Wisconsin. AAAI Press. Technical Report WS-98-05.
13. Georgios Sakkis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Georgios Paliouras, Vangelis Karkaletsis, Constantine D. Spyropoulos, and Panagiotis Stamatopoulos. 2001. Stacking classifiers for anti-spam filtering of e-mail. In L. Lee and D. Harman, editors, Proc. 6th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2001), pages 44-50, Pittsburgh, PA. Carnegie Mellon University.
14. Yiming Yang and Jan 0. Pedersen. 1997. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proc. 14th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-97), pages 412-420.