메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 239-240

Introduction: Evidence-based in vitro fertilization treatment of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: peeling away the layers of the onion

Author keywords

cryopreservation; infertility; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER; FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVE BIRTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURE LABOR; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SMALL FOR DATE INFANT; VITRIFICATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FERTILITY; INFERTILITY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84991772207     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.031     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (9)

References (4)
  • 1
    • 84991759877 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Maternal and perinatal outcomes after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer—what is the risk benefit ratio?
    • 1 Bhattacharya, S., Maternal and perinatal outcomes after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer—what is the risk benefit ratio?. Fertil Steril 106 (2016), 241–243.
    • (2016) Fertil Steril , vol.106 , pp. 241-243
    • Bhattacharya, S.1
  • 2
    • 84991784095 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?
    • 2 Glujovsky, D., Farquhar, C., Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?. Fertil Steril 106 (2016), 244–250.
    • (2016) Fertil Steril , vol.106 , pp. 244-250
    • Glujovsky, D.1    Farquhar, C.2
  • 3
    • 84979665853 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fresh versus frozen: initial transfer or cumulative cycle results: how do we interpret results and design studies?
    • 3 Cedars, M., Fresh versus frozen: initial transfer or cumulative cycle results: how do we interpret results and design studies?. Fertil Steril 106 (2016), 251–256.
    • (2016) Fertil Steril , vol.106 , pp. 251-256
    • Cedars, M.1
  • 4
    • 84908212105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement
    • 952–59.e915
    • 4 Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop G. Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement. Fertil Steril, 102, 2014 952–59.e915.
    • (2014) Fertil Steril , vol.102


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.