How Reliable Are Administrative Data for Capturing Stroke Patients and Their Care

Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 96-106

  Porter, Joan ^a   Mondor, Luke ^a   Kapral, Moira K ^a,b,c   Fang, Jiming ^a   Hall, Ruth E ^a,d,e  

^a INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e Ontario Stroke Network   (Canada)

Author keywords

Data analysis; Health services research; Stroke

Indexed keywords

TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL AUDIT; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HOSPITAL BILLING; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CODING; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STROKE PATIENT; VERY ELDERLY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84991761752     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16645456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000449288     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. De Coster C, Quan H, Finlayson A, Gao M, Halfon P, Humphries KH, Johansen H, Lix LM, Luthi JC, Ma J, Romano PS, Roos L, Sundararajan V, Tu JV, Webster G, Ghali WA: Identifying priorities in methodological research using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data: report from an international consortium. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:77.
2. Austin PC, Daly PA, Tu JV: A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario. Am Heart J 2002;144:290-296.
3. Roos LL, Gupta S, Soodeen RA, Jebamani L: Data quality in an information-rich environment: Canada as an example. Can J Aging 2005;24(suppl 1):153-170.
4. van Walraven C, Austin P: Administrative database research has unique characteristics that can risk biased results. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:126-131.
5. Andrade SE, Harrold LR, Tjia J, Cutrona SL, Saczynski JS, Dodd KS, Goldberg RJ, Gurwitz JH: A systematic review of validated methods for identifying cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack using administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21(suppl 1):100-128.
6. McCormick N, Bhole V, Lacaille D, Avina-Zubieta JA: Validity of diagnostic codes for acute stroke in administrative databases: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0135834.
7. Koton S, Schneider AL, Rosamond WD, Shahar E, Sang Y, Gottesman RF, Coresh J: Stroke incidence and mortality trends in US communities, 1987 to 2011. JAMA 2014;312:259-268.
8. Public Health Agency of Canada: Tracking heart disease and stroke in Canada-stroke highlights. Ottawa, Public Health Agency of Canada, 2011.
9. Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Alwell K, Moomaw CJ, Woo D, Adeoye O, Flaherty ML, Khatri P, Ferioli S, De Los Rios La Rosa, Broderick JP, Kleindorfer DO: Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population. Neurology 2012;79:1781-1787.
10. Smajlovic D: Strokes in young adults: epidemiology and prevention. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2015;11:157-164.
11. CSS Information and Evaluation Working Group: Canadian stroke strategy core performance indicator update. 2010. www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Stroke-Core-ENG.pdf.
12. Hall R, Porter J: Report to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care on the quality of reporting of CIHI 340 stroke data elements by Ontario acute hospitals. 2015. http://ontariostrokenetwork.ca/blog/report-to-the-ministry-of-health-and-long-term-care-on-the-quality-of-reporting-of-cihi-340-stroke-data-elements-by-ontario-acute-hospitals/.
13. du Plessis V, Beshiri R, Bollman RD, Clemenson HA: Definitions of 'rural'. Agriculture and Rural Working Paper Series, Catalogue no. 21-601-MIE. Ottawa, Statistics Canada, 2002.
14. Hall R, Khan F, O'Callaghan C, Kapral MK, Levi J, Cullen A, Wu J, Fang J, Bayley M: Evaluation report 2014: on target for stroke prevention and care. Toronto, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2014.
15. Canadian Institute for Health Information: Physician services benefit rates report, Canada, 2012-2013. Ottawa, Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2014.
16. Agresti A, Min Y: Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data. Stat Med 2004;23:65-75.
17. Altman DG: Practical statistics for medical research. London, Chapman and Hall, 1991.
18. Johnsen SP, Overvad K, Sorensen HT, Tjonneland A, Husted SE: Predictive value of stroke and transient ischemic attack discharge diagnoses in The Danish National Registry of Patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:602-607.
19. Kirkman MA, Mahattanakul W, Gregson BA, Mendelow AD: The accuracy of hospital discharge coding for hemorrhagic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg 2009;109:114-119.
20. Kokotailo RA, Hill MD: Coding of stroke and stroke risk factors using international classification of diseases, revisions 9 and 10. Stroke 2005;36:1776-1781.
21. Hall R, Mondor L, Porter J, Fang J, Kapral MK: Accuracy of administrative versus registry data for the coding of acute stroke and transient ischemic attack. Can J Neurol Sci 2016, Epub ahead of print.
22. Yiannakoulias N, Svenson LW, Hill MD, Schopflocher DP, Rowe BH, James RC, Wielgosz AT, Noseworthy TW: Incident cerebrovascular disease in rural and urban Alberta. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:72-78.
23. Lee DS, Donovan L, Austin PC, Gong Y, Liu PP, Rouleau JL, Tu JV: Comparison of coding of heart failure and comorbidities in administrative and clinical data for use in outcomes research. Med Care 2005;43:182-188.
24. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA: Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CCM administrative data. Med Care 2002;40:675-685.
25. Romano PS, Mark DH: Bias in the coding of hospital discharge data and its implications for quality assessment. Med Care 1994;32:81-90.
26. Hux JE, Ivis F, Flintoft V, Bica A: Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care 2002;25:512-516.
27. Tu K, Mitiku T, Lee DS, Guo H, Tu JV: Validation of physician billing and hospitalization data to identify patients with ischemic heart disease using data from the Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD). Can J Cardiol 2010;26:e225-e228.
28. Humphries KH, Rankin JM, Carere RG, Buller CE, Kiely FM, Spinelli JJ: Co-morbidity data in outcomes research: are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review? J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:343-349.
29. Henderson T, Shepheard J, Sundararajan V: Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2006;44:1011-1019.
30. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA: Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data. Med Care 2004;42:801-809.
31. Alshammari AM, Hux JE: The impact of non-fee-for-service reimbursement on chronic disease surveillance using administrative data. Can J Public Health 2009;100:472-474.