Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens

Public Administration and Information Technology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 349-366

  Choenni, Sunil ^a   Bargh, Mortaza S ^a   Roepan, Carmelita ^b   Meijer, Ronald F ^a  

^a Ministerie van Justitie   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

(Un)authorized access; (Un)authorized use; Crowdsourcing; Privacy; Security; Smart devices

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991753651     PISSN: 25121812     EISSN: 25121839     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_19     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bargh, M. S., & Choenni, S. (2013). On preserving privacy whilst integrating data in connected information systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Security Management (ICCSM’13), Seattle, US, 17–18 October.
2. Braak, S. W. van den, Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Trusted third parties for secure and privacy preserving data integration and sharing in the public sector. In Proceedings of the l3th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp. 135–144.
3. Cameron, K. (2005). The laws of identity. http://www.identityblog.com/?p=352/#lawsofiden_ topic3. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.
4. Centric. (2014). http://www.centric.nl/NL/Default/Branches/Lokale-overheid/Burgerschouw. Accessed 11 June 2015.
5. Chadwick, D. W. (2009). Federated identity management. In: Foundations of security analysis and design V; lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5705), 2009, pp. 96–120.
6. Chin, E., Porter Felt, A., Greenwood, K., & Wagner, D. (2011). Analyzing inter-application communication in Android. In Proceedings of MobiSys. ACM, 2011.
7. Choenni, S., & Leertouwer, E. (2010). Public safety mashups to support policy makers. In Proceedings of EGOVIS 2010, Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Bilbao, Spain, August 31–September 2, 2010. LNCS 6267, pp. 234–248.
8. Choenni, S., van Dijk, J., & Leeuw, F., (2010). Preserving privacy whilst integrating data: Applied to criminal justice. Information Polity, 15(1–2), 125–138.
9. Dawes, S. S. (2010a). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 377–383.
10. Dawes, S. S. (2010b). Information policy meta-principles: Stewardship and usefulness. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
11. DPPA. (2014). Dutch data protection authority—College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens (2014), Dutch Privacy Protection Act (DPPA)—Wbp-naslag; https://cbpweb.nl/nl/over-privacy/wetten/wbp-naslag. Accessed 11 June 2015.
12. EU. (1995). Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data.
13. Ganesan, D., & Corner, M. (2011). Crowd sourcing for data collection. http://sensorlab. cs.dartmouth.edu/NSFPervasiveComputingAtScale/pdf/15693928 97.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2014.
14. Gutmann, M., Witkowski, K., Colyer, C., O’Rourke, J., & McNally, J. (2008). Providing spatial data for secondary analysis: Issues and current practices relating to confidentiality. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(6), 639–665.
15. Hildebrandt, M., & Koops, B. J. (2010). The challenges of ambient law and legal protection in the profiling era. The Modern Law Review, 73(3), 428–460.
16. Kalidien, S., Choenni, S., & Meijer, R. (2010). Crime statistics online: Potentials and challenges. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 131–137.
17. Kosinski, M., Stillwell D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(15) Michal Kosinski, 5802–5805. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218772110.
18. Kulk, S., & van Loenen, B. (2012). Brave new open data world? International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures, 7, 196–206.
19. Meijer, R., Choenni, S., Sheikh, A. R., & Conradie, P. (2013). Bridging the contradictions of open data. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on eGovernment. Como, Italy.
20. Montjoye de, Y-Al., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013). Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3(1376). doi:10.1038/srep01376.
21. OECD. (2013). The OECD privacy framework. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/2013-oecd-privacy-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
22. Stembert, N., Conradie, P., Mulder, I., & Choenni, S. (2013). Participatory data gathering for public sector reuse: Lessons learned from traditional initiatives. Electronic government (pp. 87–98). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
23. Taylor, J. (2010). Citizens as public sensors. http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/04/crowdsourcing-the-dpw. html. Accessed 26 Feb 2014.
24. Tsai, J. Y., Kelley, P., Drielsma, P., Cranor, L. F., Hong, J., & Sadeh, N. (2009). Who’s viewed you? The impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application. Computer Human Interaction (CHI’09). ACM Press.
25. VDSS Vita Data Security Systems. (2014). http://www.vdss.nl/vdss-in-your-network.ashx. Accessed 21 Feb 2014.
26. Wang, Y., Huang, Y., & Louis, C. (September 2013). Towards a framework for privacy-aware mobile crowdsourcing. In Social Computing (SocialCom), 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 454–459). IEEE Press.
27. Zoldan, A. (5 October 2013). More data, more problems: Is big data always right?. http://www.wired.com/insights/2013/05/more-data-more-problems-is-big-data-always-right/. Accessed 11 June 2015.
28. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Meijer, R., Choenni, R., Charalabidis, Y., & Jeffery, K. (2012). Issues and guiding principles for opening governmental judicial research data. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference On Electronic Government, EGOV’12, LNCS Vol. 7443. Springer verlag, Kristiansand, Norway, September 3–6 (90–101).