Reporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: A systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients

Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Volumn 104, Issue , 2016, Pages 108-114

  Meghelli, Leila ^a   Narducci, Fabrice ^b   Mariette, Christophe ^c,d   Piessen, Guillaume ^c   Vanseymortier, Marie ^b   Leblanc, Eric ^b   Collinet, Pierre ^c   Duhamel, Alain ^a,d   Penel, Nicolas ^a,b,d  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b Oscar Lambret Centre   (France)

^c LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^d SIRIC OncoLille   (France)

Author keywords

Adverse events reporting; Cancer surgery; Clinical trials; Post operative complications; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING; ANALYSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; DATA EXTRACTION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC CANCER; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; FEMALE; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT CANCER; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POTENTIAL EXPLICATIVE FACTOR; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; STOMACH CANCER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WEIGHTED READING GRID; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84991643981     PISSN: 10408428     EISSN: 18790461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.05.017     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Blencowe, N.S., Strong, S., McNair, A.G.K., Brookes, S.T., Crosby, T., Griffin, S.M., et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review. Ann. Surg. 255:April (4) (2012), 658–666.
2. Breau, R.H., Gaboury, I., Scales, C.D., Fesperman, S.F., Watterson, J.D., Dahm, P., Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literature. J. Urol. 183:May (5) (2010), 1693–1697.
3. Chassagne, D., Sismondi, P., Horiot, J.C., Sinistrero, G., Bey, P., Zola, P., et al. A glossary for reporting complications of treatment in gynecological cancers. Radiother. Oncol. 26:March (3) (1993), 195–202.
4. Diaz-Nieto, R., Orti-Rodríguez, R., Winslet, M., Post-surgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastric cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet], 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008415.pub2/abstract [cited 2015 Aug 31].
5. Dindo, D., Demartines, N., Clavien, P.A., Classification of surgical complications – a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 240:August (2) (2004), 205–213.
6. Donat, S.M., Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 69:February (2) (2007), 221–225.
7. DCTD, NCI, NIH, DHHS. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.03. 2010.
8. Galaal, K., Bryant, A., Fisher, A.D., Al-Khaduri, M., Kew, F., Lopes, A.D., Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet], 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd [cited 2015 Aug 31].
9. Goldhahn, S., Sawaguchi, T., Audigé, L., Mundi, R., Hanson, B., Bhandari, M., et al. Complication reporting in orthopaedic trials: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 91:August (8) (2009), 1847–1853.
10. Ioannidis, J.P.A., Evans, S.J.W., Gøtzsche, P.C., O'Neill, R.T., Altman, D.G., Schulz, K., et al. Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 141:November (10) (2004), 781–788.
11. Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., Altman, D., The consort statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 285:April (15) (2001), 1987–1991.
12. Martin, R.C.G., Brennan, M.F., Jaques, D.P., Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann. Surg. 235:June (6) (2002), 803–813.
13. Mitropoulos, D., Artibani, W., Graefen, M., Remzi, M., Rouprêt, M., Truss, M., et al. Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur. Urol. 61:February (2) (2012), 341–349.
14. Potter, S., Brigic, A., Whiting, P.F., Cawthorn, S.J., Avery, K.N.L., Donovan, J.L., et al. Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 103:January (1) (2011), 31–46.
15. Rosenthal, R., Hoffmann, H., Dwan, K., Clavien, P.-A., Bucher, H.C., Reporting of adverse events in surgical trials: critical appraisal of current practice. World J. Surg. 39:January (1) (2015), 80–87.
16. Sinha, S., Sinha, S., Ashby, E., Jayaram, R., Grocott, M.P.W., Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 209(November (5)), 2009 565–71.e1.