Spherical collapse in Galileon gravity: Fifth force solutions, halo mass function and halo bias

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Barreira, Alexandre ^a   Li, Baojiu ^a   Baugh, Carlton M ^a   Pascoli, Silvia ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cosmological parameters from CMBR; Dark energy theory; Galaxy clusters; Modified gravity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991583672     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14757516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/056     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. WMAP collaboration, G. Hinshaw et al., Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 19 [arXiv:1212.5226] [INSPIRE].
2. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076 [INSPIRE].
3. J. Guy et al., The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia Supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints, Astron. Astrophys. 523 (2010) A7 [arXiv:1010.4743] [INSPIRE].
4. N. Suzuki et al., The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey: V. Improving the Dark Energy Constraints Above z > 1 and Building an Early-Type-Hosted Supernova Sample, Astrophys. J. 746 (2012) 85 [arXiv:1105.3470] [INSPIRE].
5. 2dFGRS collaboration, G. Efstathiou et al., Evidence for a non-zero lambda and a low matter density from a combined analysis of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey and cosmic microwave background anisotropies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 330 (2002) L29 [astro-ph/0109152] [INSPIRE].
6. A.G. Sanchez, M. Crocce, A. Cabre, C.M. Baugh and E. Gaztanaga, Cosmological parameter constraints from SDSS luminous red galaxies: a new treatment of large-scale clustering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 400 (2009) 1643 [arXiv:0901.2570] [INSPIRE].
7. SDSS collaboration, W.J. Percival et al., Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 Galaxy Sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 401 (2010) 2148 [arXiv:0907.1660] [INSPIRE].
8. F. Beutler et al., The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 416 (2011) 3017 [arXiv:1106.3366] [INSPIRE].
9. B.A. Reid et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurements of the growth of structure and expansion rate at z = 0.57 from anisotropic clustering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426 (2012) 2719 [arXiv:1203.6641] [INSPIRE].
10. B.A. Reid et al., Cosmological Constraints from the Clustering of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 Luminous Red Galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 404 (2010) 60 [arXiv:0907.1659] [INSPIRE].
11. L. Anderson et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Data Release 9 Spectroscopic Galaxy Sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 427 (2013) 3435 [arXiv:1203.6594] [INSPIRE].
12. A.G. Sanchez et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications of the large-scale two-point correlation function, arXiv:1203.6616 [INSPIRE].
13. T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 513 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.2476] [INSPIRE].
14. A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064036 [arXiv:0811.2197] [INSPIRE].
15. C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farèse and A. Vikman, Covariant Galileon, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084003 [arXiv:0901.1314] [INSPIRE].
16. C. Deffayet, S. Deser and G. Esposito-Farèse, Generalized Galileons: All scalar models whose curved background extensions maintain second-order field equations and stress-tensors, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 064015 [arXiv:0906.1967] [INSPIRE].
17. A. Barreira, B. Li, C.M. Baugh and S. Pascoli, Linear perturbations in Galileon gravity models, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 124016 [arXiv:1208.0600] [INSPIRE].
18. A. Barreira, B. Li, A. Sanchez, C.M. Baugh and S. Pascoli, The parameter space in Galileon gravity models, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 103511 [arXiv:1302.6241] [INSPIRE].
19. R. Gannouji and M. Sami, Galileon gravity and its relevance to late time cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 024011 [arXiv:1004.2808] [INSPIRE].
20. N. Chow and J. Khoury, Galileon Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 024037 [arXiv:0905.1325] [INSPIRE].
21. A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Cosmology of a covariant Galileon field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 111301 [arXiv:1007.2700] [INSPIRE].
22. S. Nesseris, A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Observational constraints on Galileon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 124054 [arXiv:1010.0407] [INSPIRE].
23. S.A. Appleby and E.V. Linder, The Paths of Gravity in Galileon Cosmology, JCAP 03 (2012) 043 [arXiv:1112.1981] [INSPIRE].
24. A. Ali, R. Gannouji and M. Sami, Modified gravity a la Galileon: Late time cosmic acceleration and observational constraints, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 103015 [arXiv:1008.1588] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Neveu et al., Experimental constraints on the uncoupled Galileon model from SNLS3 data and other cosmological probes, Astron. Astrophys. 555 (2013) A53 [arXiv:1302.2786] [INSPIRE].
26. S.A. Appleby and E.V. Linder, Trial of Galileon gravity by cosmological expansion and growth observations, JCAP 08 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1204.4314] [INSPIRE].
27. H. Okada, T. Totani and S. Tsujikawa, Constraints on f(R) theory and Galileons from the latest data of galaxy redshift surveys, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 103002 [arXiv:1208.4681] [INSPIRE].
28. N. Bartolo, E. Bellini, D. Bertacca and S. Matarrese, Matter bispectrum in cubic Galileon cosmologies, JCAP 03 (2013) 034 [arXiv:1301.4831] [INSPIRE].
29. R.P. Woodard, Avoiding dark energy with 1/r modifications of gravity, Lect. Notes Phys. 720 (2007) 403 [astro-ph/0601672] [INSPIRE].
30. G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363 [INSPIRE].
31. T. Damour, G.W. Gibbons and C. Gundlach, Dark Matter, Time Varying G and a Dilaton Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 123 [INSPIRE].
32. S. Baessler, B.R. Heckel, E.G. Adelberger, J.H. Gundlach, U. Schmidt and H.E. Swanson, Improved Test of the Equivalence Principle for Gravitational Self-Energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3585 [INSPIRE].
33. C.M. Will, The Confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Rel. 9 (2006) 3 [gr-qc/0510072] [INSPIRE].
34. D. Kapner et al., Tests of the gravitational inverse-square law below the dark-energy length scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 021101 [hep-ph/0611184] [INSPIRE].
35. A.I. Vainshtein, To the problem of nonvanishing gravitation mass, Phys. Lett. B 39 (1972) 393 [INSPIRE].
36. E. Babichev and C. Deffayet, An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 184001 [arXiv:1304.7240] [INSPIRE].
37. K. Koyama, G. Niz and G. Tasinato, Effective theory for the Vainshtein mechanism from the Horndeski action, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 021502 [arXiv:1305.0279] [INSPIRE].
38. A. Lewis, http://camb.info/.
39. A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 103511 [astro-ph/0205436] [INSPIRE].
40. A. Barreira, B. Li, W.A. Hellwing, C.M. Baugh and S. Pascoli, Nonlinear structure formation in the Cubic Galileon gravity model, JCAP 10 (2013) 027 [arXiv:1306.3219] [INSPIRE].
41. B. Li, G.-B. Zhao, R. Teyssier and K. Koyama, ECOSMOG: An Efficient Code for Simulating Modified Gravity, JCAP 01 (2012) 051 [arXiv:1110.1379] [INSPIRE].
42. B. Li, G.-B. Zhao and K. Koyama, Exploring Vainshtein mechanism on adaptively refined meshes, JCAP 05 (2013) 023 [arXiv:1303.0008] [INSPIRE].
43. B. Li et al., Simulating the quartic Galileon gravity model on adaptively refined meshes, arXiv:1308.3491 [INSPIRE].
44. J.R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou and N. Kaiser, Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations, Astrophys. J. 379 (1991) 440 [INSPIRE].
45. C. Deffayet, O. Pujolàs, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman, Imperfect Dark Energy from Kinetic Gravity Braiding, JCAP 10 (2010) 026 [arXiv:1008.0048] [INSPIRE].
46. E. Babichev and G. Esposito-Farèse, Time-dependent spherically symmetric covariant Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 044032 [arXiv:1212.1394] [INSPIRE].
47. A. De Felice, R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa, Matter perturbations in Galileon cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 043515 [arXiv:1011.6132] [INSPIRE].
48. E. Bellini, N. Bartolo and S. Matarrese, Spherical Collapse in covariant Galileon theory, JCAP 06 (2012) 019 [arXiv:1202.2712] [INSPIRE].
49. E. Babichev, C. Deffayet and G. Esposito-Farese, Constraints on Shift-Symmetric Scalar-Tensor Theories with a Vainshtein Mechanism from Bounds on the Time Variation of G, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 251102 [arXiv:1107.1569] [INSPIRE].
50. R. Kimura, T. Kobayashi and K. Yamamoto, Vainshtein screening in a cosmological background in the most general second-order scalar-tensor theory, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 024023 [arXiv:1111.6749] [INSPIRE].
51. J.G. Williams, S.G. Turyshev and D.H. Boggs, Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 261101 [gr-qc/0411113] [INSPIRE].
52. A.R. Zentner, The Excursion Set Theory of Halo Mass Functions, Halo Clustering and Halo Growth, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16 (2007) 763 [astro-ph/0611454] [INSPIRE].
53. E. Gaztanaga and J.A. Lobo, Nonlinear gravitational growth of large scale structures inside and outside standard cosmology, Astrophys. J. 548 (2001) 47 [astro-ph/0003129] [INSPIRE].
54. B.M. Schaefer and K. Koyama, Spherical collapse in modified gravity with the Birkhoff-theorem, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 385 (2008) 411 [arXiv:0711.3129] [INSPIRE].
55. M.C. Martino, H.F. Stabenau and R.K. Sheth, Spherical Collapse and Modified Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084013 [arXiv:0812.0200] [INSPIRE].
56. B. Li and G. Efstathiou, An Extended Excursion Set Approach to Structure Formation in Chameleon Models, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 421 (2012) 1431 [arXiv:1110.6440] [INSPIRE].
57. A. Borisov, B. Jain and P. Zhang, Spherical Collapse in f(R) Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 063518 [arXiv:1102.4839] [INSPIRE].
58. T.Y. Lam and B. Li, Excursion set theory for modified gravity: correlated steps, mass functions and halo bias, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426 (2012) 3260 [arXiv:1205.0059] [INSPIRE].
59. B. Li and T.Y. Lam, Excursion set theory for modified gravity: Eulerian versus Lagrangian environments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 425 (2012) 730 [arXiv:1205.0058] [INSPIRE].
60. J. Clampitt and Y.-C. Cai, Voids in Modified Gravity: Excursion Set Predictions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 431 (2013) 749 [arXiv:1212.2216] [INSPIRE].
61. L. Lombriser, B. Li, K. Koyama and G.-B. Zhao, Modeling halo mass functions in chameleon f(R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 123511 [arXiv:1304.6395] [INSPIRE].
62. M. Kopp, S.A. Appleby, I. Achitouv and J. Weller, Spherical collapse and halo mass function in f(R) theories, arXiv:1306.3233 [INSPIRE].
63. J.M. Bardeen, J. Bond, N. Kaiser and A. Szalay, The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields, Astrophys. J. 304 (1986) 15 [INSPIRE].
64. W.H. Press and P. Schechter, Formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by selfsimilar gravitational condensation, Astrophys. J. 187 (1974) 425 [INSPIRE].
65. K. Parfrey, L. Hui and R.K. Sheth, Scale-dependent halo bias from scale-dependent growth, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 063511 [arXiv:1012.1335] [INSPIRE].
66. H. Mo and S.D. White, An Analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter halos, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 282 (1996) 347 [astro-ph/9512127] [INSPIRE].
67. J.N. Fry and E. Gaztanaga, Biasing and hierarchical statistics in large scale structure, Astrophys. J. 413 (1993) 447 [astro-ph/9302009] [INSPIRE].
68. R.K. Sheth and G. Tormen, Large scale bias and the peak background split, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 308 (1999) 119 [astro-ph/9901122] [INSPIRE].
69. R.K. Sheth, H. Mo and G. Tormen, Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 323 (2001) 1 [astro-ph/9907024] [INSPIRE].
70. R.K. Sheth and G. Tormen, An Excursion set model of hierarchical clustering: Ellipsoidal collapse and the moving barrier, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 329 (2002) 61 [astro-ph/0105113] [INSPIRE].
71. F. Schmidt, Dynamical Masses in Modified Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 103002 [arXiv:1003.0409] [INSPIRE].
72. NL from Massive High-Redshift Galaxy Clusters, JCAP 04 (2011) 017 [arXiv:1012.2732] [INSPIRE].
73. M. Jee et al., Scaling Relations and Overabundance of Massive Clusters at z > 1 from Weak-Lensing Studies with HST, Astrophys. J. 737 (2011) 59 [arXiv:1105.3186] [INSPIRE].
74. B. Hoyle, R. Jimenez and L. Verde, Implications of multiple high-redshift galaxy clusters, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 103502 [arXiv:1009.3884] [INSPIRE].
75. D.E. Holz and S. Perlmutter, The most massive objects in the Universe, arXiv:1004.5349 [INSPIRE].
76. B.R. Granett, M.C. Neyrinck and I. Szapudi, An Imprint of Super-Structures on the Microwave Background due to the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect, Astrophys. J. 683 (2008) L99 [arXiv:0805.3695] [INSPIRE].
77. P. Papai, I. Szapudi and B.R. Granett, Integrated Sachs-Wolf imprint of superstructures on linear scales, Astrophys. J. 732 (2011) 27 [arXiv:1012.3750] [INSPIRE].
78. S. Nadathur, S. Hotchkiss and S. Sarkar, The integrated Sachs-Wolfe imprints of cosmic superstructures: a problem for ΛCDM, JCAP 06 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1109.4126] [INSPIRE].
79. S. Flender, S. Hotchkiss and S. Nadathur, The stacked ISW signal of rare superstructures in ΛCDM, JCAP 02 (2013) 013 [arXiv:1212.0776] [INSPIRE].
80. S. Hotchkiss, Quantifying the rareness of extreme galaxy clusters, JCAP 07 (2011) 004 [arXiv:1105.3630] [INSPIRE].
81. I. Harrison and P. Coles, Testing Cosmology with Extreme Galaxy Clusters, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 421 (2012) L19 [arXiv:1111.1184] [INSPIRE].
82. B. Hoyle, R. Jimenez, L. Verde and S. Hotchkiss, A critical analysis of high-redshift, massive galaxy clusters: I, JCAP 02 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1108.5458] [INSPIRE].
83. J.-C. Waizmann, S. Ettori and M. Bartelmann, Order statistics applied to the most massive and most distant galaxy clusters, arXiv:1210.6021 [INSPIRE].
84. J.-C. Waizmann, S. Ettori and L. Moscardini, An application of extreme value statistics to the most massive galaxy clusters at low and high redshifts, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 420 (2012) 1754 [arXiv:1109.4820] [INSPIRE].
85. C.Y. Yaryura, C.M. Baugh and R.E. Angulo, Are the superstructures in the two-degree field galaxy redshift survey a problem for hierarchical models?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 413 (2011) 1311 [arXiv:1003.4259] [INSPIRE].
86. S. Matarrese, L. Verde and R. Jimenez, The Abundance of high-redshift objects as a probe of non-Gaussian initial conditions, Astrophys. J. 541 (2000) 10 [astro-ph/0001366] [INSPIRE].
87. E. Sefusatti, C. Vale, K. Kadota and J. Frieman, Primordial non-Gaussianity and Dark Energy constraints from Cluster Surveys, Astrophys. J. 658 (2007) 669 [astro-ph/0609124] [INSPIRE].
88. A. Trindade, P. Avelino and P. Viana, Biased cosmological parameter estimation with galaxy cluster counts in the presence of primordial non-Gaussianities, arXiv:1304.4275 [INSPIRE].
89. D.A. Wake et al., The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: Evolution of the clustering of Luminous Red Galaxies since z = 0.6, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 387 (2008) 1045 [arXiv:0802.4288] [INSPIRE].
90. Z. Zheng, I. Zehavi, D.J. Eisenstein, D.H. Weinberg and Y. Jing, Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of Clustering of Luminous Red Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 707 (2009) 554 [arXiv:0809.1868] [INSPIRE].
91. U. Sawangwit et al., Angular correlation function of 1.5 million LRGs: clustering evolution and a search for BAO, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 416 (2011) 3033 [arXiv:0912.0511] [INSPIRE].
92. Y.-C. Cai, G. Bernstein and R.K. Sheth, Optimal linear reconstruction of dark matter from halo catalogs, arXiv:1007.3500 [INSPIRE].
93. N. Hamaus, U. Seljak, V. Desjacques, R.E. Smith and T. Baldauf, Minimizing the Stochasticity of Halos in Large-Scale Structure Surveys, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 043515 [arXiv:1004.5377] [INSPIRE].
94. A. Cooray and R.K. Sheth, Halo models of large scale structure, Phys. Rept. 372 (2002) 1 [astro-ph/0206508] [INSPIRE].
95. F. Schmidt, W. Hu and M. Lima, Spherical Collapse and the Halo Model in Braneworld Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 063005 [arXiv:0911.5178] [INSPIRE].