The form of performance: Analyzing pattern distribution in select recordings of Chopin's Mazurka Op. 24 No. 2

Musicae Scientiae

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 23-55

  Spiro, Neta ^a   Gold, Nicolas ^b   Rink, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991294624     PISSN: 10298649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/102986491001400202     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chaffin R. Lemieux A. F. Chen C. (2007). It’s different each time I play: Variability in highly prepared musical performance. Music Perception, 24, 455–472.
2. Clarke E. F. (1988). Generative principles in music performance. In Sloboda J.A.,(Ed. ), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Clarke E. F. (1995). Expression in performance: Generativity, perception and semiosis. In Rink J.,(Ed. ), The practice of performance (pp. 21–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cook N. (2009). Squaring the circle: Phrase arching in recordings of Chopin’s mazurkas. Musica Humana, 1, 5–28.
5. Cook N. Sapp C. (2008). Une pure coïncidence? Joyce Hatto et les Mazurkas de Chopin, trans. Jean-François Cornu. L’étincelle: Le journal de la création à l’IRCAM, 3, 19–21.
6. Friberg A. Battel G.U. (2002). Structural communication. In Parncutt R., McPherson G.E.,(Eds. ), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 199–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Gabrielsson A. (1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart’s piano sonata in A major (K.331). In Gabrielsson A.,(Ed. ), Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 81–103). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
8. Gjerdingen R.O. (1988). Shape and motion in the microstructure of song. Music Perception, 6, 35–64.
9. Juslin P. N. (2000). Cue utilization in communication of emotion in music performance: Relating performance to perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1797–1813.
10. Kohonen T. Hynninen J. Kangas J. Laaksonen J. (1996). SOM_PAK: The self-organizing map program package, technical report A31. Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, FIN-02150. Espoo, Finland.
11. Kohonen T. (2001). Self-organizing maps (3rd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
12. Leech-Wilkinson D. (2009). Recordings and histories of performance style. Recordings and histories of performance style. In Cook N., Leech-Wilkinson D., Clarke E., Rink J.,(Eds. ), The Cambridge companion to recorded music (pp. 246–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lerdahl F. Jackendoff R.A. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press.
14. Palmer C. (1996). Anatomy of a performance: Sources of musical expression. Music Perception, 13, 433–454.
15. Palmer C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115–138.
16. Pampalk E. Widmer G. Chan A. (2004). A new approach to hierarchical clustering and structuring of data with self-organizing maps. Intelligent Data Analysis, 8, 131–149.
17. Réti R. (1961). The thematic process in music. New York: Faber and Faber.
18. Rink J. Spiro N. Gold N. (forthcoming). Motive, gesture and the analysis of performance. In Gritten A., King E.,(Eds. ), New perspectives on music and gesture. Farnham: Ashgate.
19. Sapp C. (2007). Comparative analysis of multiple musical performances. In Dixon S., Bainbridge D., Typke R.,(Eds. ), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on music information retrieval, Vienna, Austria, September 23–27, 2007 (pp. 497–500). Vienna: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft.
20. Seashore C.E. (1938). Psychology of music. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Shaffer L.H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach and Bartók: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326–376.
22. Shaffer L.H. (1995). Musical performance as interpretation. Psychology of Music, 23, 17–38.
23. Spiro N. Gold N. Rink J. (2008). Plus ça change: Analyzing performances of Chopin’s mazurka op. 24 no. 2. In Miyazaki K., Hiraga Y., Adachi M., Nakajima Y., Tsuzaki M.,(Eds. ), Proceedings of 10th international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 418–427). Sapporo: ICMPC10.
24. Sundberg J. Friberg A. Frydén L. (1991). Common secrets of musicians and listeners—An analysis-by-synthesis study of musical performance. In Howell P., West R., Cross I.,(Eds. ), Representing Musical Structure (pp. 161–197). London: Academic Press.
25. Todd N. (1985). A model of expressive timing in tonal music. Music Perception 3/1, 33–58.